Quote:
Originally Posted by virgohippy
I dunno... think it about it this way:
If I work hard to build up an environment where I hope to market porn, not traffic, why would I introduce an element that could disturb that market?
There are plenty of other webmasters who are willing to focus on sales first and allow the traffic build up slowly over time.
What's the point of owning a LL anyway? To make money by converting traffic to $$$, right? As a LL owner, part of that involves making sure submitters make money from their freesites so they can continue to submit, but a LL is not a toplist afterall. |shocking|
|
I don't really understand your points here and I'm not trying to bust your balls, but I'll just give you my opinion, which I probably should have done last night minus the sarcasm.
IMO, with a LL in it's infancy as JustRoberts is, his first priority should not be harvesting traffic but instead harvesting loyal submitters. If he wants to deny for a hub link at the top of the page, that's fine it's his list, his choice. And yes there are submitters out there that won't put a hub list up on top of the page, but why ostracize the ones that do?
From his further explaination of the situation you can see there were other things going on with that submitter, so maybe his original response sounded like he was much more strict about this then he might actually be with a good clean submission.
Yes, you are right a linklist is not a toplist. A linklist is supposed to list free sites with no more then 3 outgoing links. If you are deciding what links are appropriate to be in a certain position or of a certain text height then is it still a linklist?