Quote:
Originally Posted by FanTC
Obviously, you , my dear, are a fucking retard.
|
If any person in favor of anti-bestiality (where no animal is physically harmed) laws can come up with a morsel of rational justification for them (right alongside rationale for why doing sexual things with animals is somehow much crueler and more criminal than any of those other things I mentioned) then I'll gladly consign myself to the "retard" pile. Otherwise I think you, "my dear", are the retard for not coming up with anything better than that.
Unfortunately this is one of those issues where people are totally irrational -- it has nothing to do with caring about animals or even people, and has everything to do with a hysterical fear of sex.
Whatever, though. I realize this is one of those issues where people can't have a logical argument because they're so afraid everyone will label them sickos and perverts . . . and retards . . . if they use their brains for half a second. If no animal is hurt and the only humans that are hurt consented to it, then it's a victimless crime.
By the by, I do think the first guy to get in trouble here in WA since the law was passed TOTALLY deserved it; he was fucking a dog and totally hurting it. Of course, the animal CRUELTY laws should be sufficient to prosecute these kinds of assholes, though.