Quote:
Originally Posted by whitey
Honest Question...
Why would anyone hustling porn support the requirements of 2257 which is noble in intent but abusive in intent and subject to abuse in implementation and completely ineffective in achieving its objective?
|
That's almost exactly what I thought when I read that story. I really think that approach is backwards. We should focus on getting rid of 2257 not rant about how it should be applied more broadly (especially with something like this where the participants are clearly adults, or at least chuy is . . . I haven't watched the movie; does it look like anyone is underage in it? That's one of my big beefs with 2257 is that it obviously has nothing to do with focusing on protecting actual children).