Perez Hilton - where's your 2257

[whitey]

Originally Posted by tickler

It didn't take long for the Chuy clip to make the news & the tubes

BTW. I wouldn't mind one bit if they tossed this shit spewer Hilton in prison.

But, he'd probably like it too much


Lets see: creek + no paddles

Honest Question...

Why would anyone hustling porn support the requirements of 2257 which is noble in intent but abusive in intent and subject to abuse in implementation and completely ineffective in achieving its objective?

My take on the story is that it exposes the problems with 2257 in the modern world. And to that, I say hurrah - despite his modicum of irresponsibility.

[tickler]

Originally Posted by whitey

Honest Question...

Why would anyone hustling porn support the requirements of 2257 which is noble in intent but abusive in intent and subject to abuse in implementation and completely ineffective in achieving its objective?

My take on the story is that it exposes the problems with 2257 in the modern world. And to that, I say hurrah - despite his modicum of irresponsibility.

First off, my post is more about that asshat & tubes maybe getting into trouble than 2257

I pretty much agree with what you said about the 2257 problems, but we have to live with it until it gets struck down. And yes, civilians can get mixed up in it.

As far as intent, while 2257 is the law I see no problem using 2257 as a weapon against illegal tubes.

I was going to post a bunch more, but it's late

[Trixie]

Originally Posted by whitey

Honest Question...

Why would anyone hustling porn support the requirements of 2257 which is noble in intent but abusive in intent and subject to abuse in implementation and completely ineffective in achieving its objective?

That's almost exactly what I thought when I read that story. I really think that approach is backwards. We should focus on getting rid of 2257 not rant about how it should be applied more broadly (especially with something like this where the participants are clearly adults, or at least chuy is . . . I haven't watched the movie; does it look like anyone is underage in it? That's one of my big beefs with 2257 is that it obviously has nothing to do with focusing on protecting actual children).