|
2008-06-01, 06:22 PM | #1 |
I want to set the record straight - I thought the cop was a prostitute
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 293
|
Uniques per day percentages.
I was chatting to someone a couple of days ago, and when I mentioned that only 3% of my uniques per day were from search engines, well he nearly shat.
All of his websites are hitting around the 65% mark for search engine traffic, although on a whole we are getting roughly the same uniques. I was just wondering what other peoples stats are telling them and should I be looking for more search engine traffic? (I mean all my pages are well optimised and my sites rank fairly well (top 10 for well used searches)). |
2008-06-03, 11:08 AM | #2 |
Wheither you think you can or you think you can't, Your right.
|
If your talking about the sites in your signature, I wouldn't call them well optimized. Also, what keywords do you rank well for? Reason I asked is I've seen so many people say they rank well for such-in-such keyword, when in reality that keyword gets little to no searches.
Your friend is right, 3% is very low. Then again, how old are your sites, what have you done for building links, ect, ect. A number of variables. |
2008-06-03, 02:51 PM | #3 |
That'll teach you to leave your sister unattended.....
|
It depends a lot on what the sites are intended to do - 3% SE traffic on a FS or gallery is average in my experience. I get in the 80% range on some blogs and what I call 'content sites' (SE tuned hubs with targeted blog-type text).
And I do target some less common key words - and get decent conversions on most of them. They will never send the same quantity of traffic as getting #1 for "porn" but getting #3, #4 and #7 on Google "Colorado amateur porn" actually sends targeted traffic and gets me real sales. #5, #6, and #8 are all LL's that list my FS's - so indirectly, I should be getting some of that traffic. |
2008-06-04, 06:45 AM | #4 | |
I want to set the record straight - I thought the cop was a prostitute
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 293
|
Quote:
What would you suggest I do to make them better optimised? Just-Bondage is #2 for bondage pictures on google and #10 for free bondage pictures SimplyTied wasn't one of the ones I was referring to, but performs well in terms (probably not widely searched for) like bondage photography (#2) and artistic bondage(#2). Just-Bondage is little over a year old, and to be honest I haven't done as much link building as I could have (something I am changing at the moment actually!) |
|
2008-06-04, 06:47 AM | #5 |
I want to set the record straight - I thought the cop was a prostitute
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 293
|
Would you say it is better to optimise for less common but high converting keywords than more general ones?
|
2008-06-04, 07:29 AM | #6 | |
That'll teach you to leave your sister unattended.....
|
Quote:
So, say I sell teen porn, and I'm optimizing for the term "teen+porn" and I'm currently on page 19 of Google for that term. I might get 10 uniques visitors a day if I'm lucky. However, if I continue to tune for "lesbian+teen+porn" and can get on the first page of Google, I might get 300 plus uniques visitors a day. Take that further - say I ONLY offer "Teen Porn" - and I somehow get listed as #2 for the single word "porn" - I might get thousands of unique visitors a day but only 1/4th of them are even remotely looking for "Teen Porn" - my traffic goes up but my conversion rates go down. Of course, tuning for a search term that is never searched on is a total waste of time. according to wordtracker: search term = daily searches porn = 193176 teen porn = 14029 teen lesbian porn = 286 hairy teen lesbian porn = 0 So tuning for "hairy teen lesbian porn" is a total wast of time. I use this tool http://www.submitexpress.com/keytracker.php to get a general idea of the number of times search term is used per day but there are many more out there. I also use this tool http://www.seocentro.com/tools/searc...-analyzer.html for checking the "tune" of my sites. Last edited by papagmp; 2008-06-04 at 07:35 AM.. |
|
|
|