Using Sponsor Content that was not used before

tigermom · 2006-05-22, 10:39 AM

I know sponsor content got itself a bad rep, but that's just because of overexposure and abnoxious watermarks, right? If I get exclusive sets from a sponsor and they have none or very small watermarks, then I'm safe, right? Is that the case even if the site itself has been overexposed?

Say, for example that I get exclusive sets from Nasty Dollars to promote MILF Hunter with - could I still get the site disqualified on the grounds of using sponsor content, even if I'm the only affiliate who can use those sets? (Using ND as an example, I have arrangements with other sponsors, but not with them as it happens

). I just assume that MILF Hunter sets are used often, hence this example.

To sum it up, if that particular set has not been submitted to LL's before, but others by the same site/sponsor have been, is that still overexposed content?

2006-05-22, 10:39 AM	#1
tigermom You can now put whatever you want in this space :) Join Date: Dec 2005 Posts: 893	Using Sponsor Content that was not used before I know sponsor content got itself a bad rep, but that's just because of overexposure and abnoxious watermarks, right? If I get exclusive sets from a sponsor and they have none or very small watermarks, then I'm safe, right? Is that the case even if the site itself has been overexposed? Say, for example that I get exclusive sets from Nasty Dollars to promote MILF Hunter with - could I still get the site disqualified on the grounds of using sponsor content, even if I'm the only affiliate who can use those sets? (Using ND as an example, I have arrangements with other sponsors, but not with them as it happens ). I just assume that MILF Hunter sets are used often, hence this example. To sum it up, if that particular set has not been submitted to LL's before, but others by the same site/sponsor have been, is that still overexposed content? __________________ XLEF