| 
 | 
|  |  |  |  |  | 
|  2006-03-01, 08:58 AM | #1 | 
| Banned Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: Mohawk, New York 
					Posts: 19,477
				 | 
				
				The problem with small judges
			 So, as I have mentioned before, I am stuck having to watch Judge Judy.  She was a real family court judge and seems to represent most small time judges. So, yesterday, there is a guy that had his picture posted and the girl that owns http://www.hotghettomess.com/ took it, put her logo on it and put it on her site. Judy said that it didn't seem to be destructive to the guy and gave him nothing and said that the girl didn't have to remove it but she should be nice and do it anyway. WTF??? Was all I could say to my wife. I was actually screaming at the TV  | 
|   |   | 
|  2006-03-01, 09:43 AM | #2 | 
| Jim? I heard he's a dirty pornographer. Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: Washington, DC 
					Posts: 2,706
				 | Jim, do people go to Judge Judy for justice or publicity? | 
|   |   | 
|  2006-03-01, 10:21 AM | #3 | 
| Banned Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: Mohawk, New York 
					Posts: 19,477
				 | Both I think...and they get paid.  But, the last thing this guy wanted was more exposure.  I'm sure the girl that runs the site agreed to go because of the exposure to her site.  She made it clear that everyone knew the url of the site. But my point here is that she stole the picture of the guy off his own site and put her logo on the picture and posted it on her own site. And then the judge says she has no legal reason to force the girl to remove the picture. She just kept telling the guy to lighten up. | 
|   |   | 
|  2006-03-01, 10:23 AM | #4 | 
| Banned Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: Mohawk, New York 
					Posts: 19,477
				 | And...Judy agreed with the girl that it was a constitutional issue to a point. | 
|   |   | 
|  2006-03-01, 12:16 PM | #5 | 
| Trying is the first step towards failure | I seen something like that befor on another TV Judge show, Peoples Court I think. She ruled the same way and in her opinion stated that the image was not copyrighted, therefor not protected. Then stated that it only cost X amount of dollars to copyright online or some crap like that. I think the ruling sucks and is wrong too... Ben 
				__________________ SinSexual Porn | 
|   |   | 
|  2006-03-01, 12:22 PM | #6 | |
| Banned Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: Mohawk, New York 
					Posts: 19,477
				 | Quote: 
  Again, I was screaming.  At least this time, Judy admitted that she doesn't know anything about the internet and hates those "machines". | |
|   |   | 
|  2006-03-01, 12:28 PM | #7 | 
| Trying is the first step towards failure | LOL,  Yeah, she always has Burt do the stuff for her... machines (she admitts) are to complicated and yet claims to be smarter than anyone and everyone... Made for TV for sure. Ben 
				__________________ SinSexual Porn Last edited by quest; 2006-03-01 at 12:34 PM.. | 
|   |   | 
|  2006-03-01, 12:32 PM | #8 | 
| Banned Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: Mohawk, New York 
					Posts: 19,477
				 | I have checked out that site a few times today and 1/2 the time it is down.  I guess her server wasn't quite ready for what Judy claims is 10 million people watching   | 
|   |   | 
|  2006-03-01, 12:33 PM | #9 | 
| Banned Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: Mohawk, New York 
					Posts: 19,477
				 | But still, I could see a small time real judge making the same ruling.  Then again, how often is the content thief in your own hometown? | 
|   |   | 
|  2006-03-01, 12:46 PM | #10 | 
| Trying is the first step towards failure | I suppose it would really depend on what type of scrutiny was applied in making the decision. Out right thief or, one business taking from another but the first business not having copyright protection. The second will not help ones reputation working online. That probably should be pointed out to the newer people starting out online. You steal someones work in the online business and get called out on it, your more than likely done, as far as being trusted. Ben 
				__________________ SinSexual Porn | 
|   |   | 
|  2006-03-03, 05:35 PM | #11 | 
| WHO IS FONZY!?! Don't they teach you anything at school? Join Date: Jan 2006 
					Posts: 48
				 | Hahah!!! | 
|   |   | 
|  2006-03-03, 05:37 PM | #12 | 
| WHO IS FONZY!?! Don't they teach you anything at school? Join Date: Jan 2006 
					Posts: 48
				 | Fuck a small town judge | 
|   |   | 
|  2006-03-05, 04:52 AM | #13 | 
| Hey, can you take the wheel for a second, I have to scratch my self in two places at once | I know this thread was buried to some degree, but I found a few pics on HotGhettoMess that were from other sites, including paysites... don't the sites logos iply ownership and therefore are copywritten? bunky 
				__________________ XXX Link Dump submit away! =) | 
|   |   | 
|  2006-03-05, 10:45 AM | #14 | |
| Banned Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: Mohawk, New York 
					Posts: 19,477
				 | Quote: 
 The People's Court came right out and said, you have to spend a few bucks to get things copyrighted. Judge Judy was just stupid. She never mentioned a copyright. She just said, the woman didn't say anything hurtful so it was ok. | |
|   |   | 
|  | 
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread | 
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread | 
| 
 | 
 |