First Attempt- Please critique

emmanuelle · 2004-06-29, 11:20 AM

While I've been in the paysite biz since 99, this is my first attempt at a freesite (go figure)

I'd love it if people more experienced than I could take a look, and let me know if I'm on the right page, as well as the liklihood of it being listed.

http://www.wickedskinmedia.com/work/...lack/freesite/

Many thanks in advance!

MrMaryLou · 2004-06-29, 11:33 AM

Well the first thing I see is that the full size pics open in a new window and thats pretty much a no no and most link list

Also you might want to add some linkable text with the banners

Other than those two things not bad at all

emmanuelle · 2004-06-29, 11:35 AM

ok- we'll fix those pic links right away-
Please tell me, should the pics open alone or on an html page?

thanks!

MrMaryLou · 2004-06-29, 12:03 PM

Well some like them on html pages but allot of link lists are shying away from that beacuse lots of webmasters are adding lots of crap to the pages so your better off having them with out

1freepornfinder · 2004-06-29, 04:57 PM

nice lookin site... we would list it...

DangerDave · 2004-06-29, 05:58 PM

Umm every pic is 140K+

This will ge you Re-

-jected

DD

emmanuelle · 2004-06-29, 07:07 PM

really? Why would high quality pics earn a rejection? Isnt user satisfaction of high importance?
(outdoor pics are hard to compress though)

DangerDave · 2004-06-29, 07:16 PM

Quality is good emmanuelle, but downloadability is a big factor.. especially with sales...

A significant proportion of the web are still using dialup.

Additionally... bandwidth can be an issue for "you" when you get 1000 hits to a site with 140K pics the BW is significantly more than it would be for the same no. of hits to a site with 50K pics

DD

emmanuelle · 2004-06-30, 09:10 PM

thanks everyone!

Mishi · 2004-07-02, 06:19 AM

Emmanuelle, I think it's a gorgeous site and I would list it in a heartbeat. (Hint, hint.)

I don't personally reject sites based on image size, but I kind of understand where DD is coming from. Of course I can't speak for him, but from my point of view, (1) large images are a waste of your bandwidth, and indicative of serious newbieness (I know this is not the case where you're concerned) and (2) More important - make 'em pay for high-quality images. Free sites should give a preview, not the full product.

My 2 bits.

2004-06-29, 11:20 AM	#1
emmanuelle 0100011101100101011001010 1101011001000000100001101 1010000110100101100011 Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: Montreal Posts: 1,441	First Attempt- Please critique While I've been in the paysite biz since 99, this is my first attempt at a freesite (go figure) I'd love it if people more experienced than I could take a look, and let me know if I'm on the right page, as well as the liklihood of it being listed. http://www.wickedskinmedia.com/work/...lack/freesite/ Many thanks in advance!

2004-06-29, 11:33 AM	#2
MrMaryLou i fucking told i type to fucking fast wtf Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: New York Posts: 11,247	Well the first thing I see is that the full size pics open in a new window and thats pretty much a no no and most link list Also you might want to add some linkable text with the banners Other than those two things not bad at all __________________ <a href="http://www.greenguysboard.com/onthebench/">Join Me For On The Bench </a>

2004-06-29, 12:03 PM	#4
MrMaryLou i fucking told i type to fucking fast wtf Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: New York Posts: 11,247	Well some like them on html pages but allot of link lists are shying away from that beacuse lots of webmasters are adding lots of crap to the pages so your better off having them with out __________________ <a href="http://www.greenguysboard.com/onthebench/">Join Me For On The Bench </a>

2004-06-29, 04:57 PM	#5
1freepornfinder You tried your best and you failed miserably. The lesson is 'never try' Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Virginia Posts: 162	nice lookin site... we would list it... __________________ www.1freepornfinder.com www.freeporn-sites.net www.freegaypornfinder.com

2004-06-29, 05:58 PM	#6
DangerDave Bonged Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: BrisVegas, AUSTRALIA Posts: 4,882	Umm every pic is 140K+ This will ge you Re--jected DD __________________ Old Dollars >>>> Now with over 90 Hosted Free Sites <<<< DangerDave.com.au - Adult Links to Free Porn

2004-06-29, 11:35 AM	#3
emmanuelle 0100011101100101011001010 1101011001000000100001101 1010000110100101100011 Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: Montreal Posts: 1,441	ok- we'll fix those pic links right away- Please tell me, should the pics open alone or on an html page? thanks!

2004-06-29, 07:07 PM	#7
emmanuelle 0100011101100101011001010 1101011001000000100001101 1010000110100101100011 Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: Montreal Posts: 1,441	really? Why would high quality pics earn a rejection? Isnt user satisfaction of high importance? (outdoor pics are hard to compress though)

2004-06-29, 07:16 PM	#8
DangerDave Bonged Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: BrisVegas, AUSTRALIA Posts: 4,882	Quality is good emmanuelle, but downloadability is a big factor.. especially with sales... A significant proportion of the web are still using dialup. Additionally... bandwidth can be an issue for "you" when you get 1000 hits to a site with 140K pics the BW is significantly more than it would be for the same no. of hits to a site with 50K pics DD __________________ Old Dollars >>>> Now with over 90 Hosted Free Sites <<<< DangerDave.com.au - Adult Links to Free Porn

2004-06-30, 09:10 PM	#9
emmanuelle 0100011101100101011001010 1101011001000000100001101 1010000110100101100011 Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: Montreal Posts: 1,441	thanks everyone!

2004-07-02, 06:19 AM	#10
Mishi I want to live. I want to experience the universe, and I want to eat pie. Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: Where the wind comes sweeping down the plain Posts: 661	Emmanuelle, I think it's a gorgeous site and I would list it in a heartbeat. (Hint, hint.) I don't personally reject sites based on image size, but I kind of understand where DD is coming from. Of course I can't speak for him, but from my point of view, (1) large images are a waste of your bandwidth, and indicative of serious newbieness (I know this is not the case where you're concerned) and (2) More important - make 'em pay for high-quality images. Free sites should give a preview, not the full product. My 2 bits.