|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Stupid risks make life worth living
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 381
|
Three Gallery Free Sites
Do any LLs not accept these?
I can see where they would be more of a challenge with content but you would also have more advertising real estate. What are some opinions on the advantages/disadvantages? |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
The Original Greenguy (Est'd 1996) & AVN HOF Member - I Crop Pics For Thumbs In My Sleep
|
I accept them, as long as their's still 12 pics per gallery (otherwise, people would submit 3 gallery sites with 8 pics per page or 4 gallery sites with 6 pics per page)
It is a lot of content, but you are right that it does give you another page of ads, so it's really up to you. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Arghhhh...submit yer sites ya ruddy swabs!
|
No problemos here with 3 gallery sites
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
You can't disprove anything with evidence that doesn't exist
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: NW Minnesota - pop 865 +/- 1
Posts: 2,038
|
Fine with me
__________________
This is me Mark's-Links |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
I don't have to be careful. I got a gun
|
I list them too, thought I'd be curios how's traffic that comes off that type of free sites converting, because IMHO 3 galleries means to much content given away for free.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Bow Ties Are Cool
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: California
Posts: 9,692
|
I have no problems with 3 gallery sites as well
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
That which does not kill us, will try, try again.
|
Sometime in 2007, the 3-gallery free site will become the minimum accepted at one or more link lists.
![]()
__________________
"If you're happy and you know it, think again." -- Guru Pitka |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
The Original Greenguy (Est'd 1996) & AVN HOF Member - I Crop Pics For Thumbs In My Sleep
|
You know - that's not that bad of a concept - I'm going to have to look into the 3 gallery 8 pics minimum concept.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
on vacation
|
Quote:
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Madness is like gravity. All it takes is a little... push.
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: California
Posts: 1,679
|
Quote:
![]()
__________________
~Warm and Fuzzy.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Madness is like gravity. All it takes is a little... push.
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: California
Posts: 1,679
|
Quote:
As long as it's an option, either 2 galleries of 12 minimum, or 3 galleries of 8 minimum, you got my vote.
__________________
~Warm and Fuzzy.
Last edited by virgohippy; 2006-11-15 at 05:28 PM.. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Stupid risks make life worth living
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 381
|
Great feedback from all on this one! I was looking at it primarily from the perspective of time management... I would think that it would be positive for SEO as well. The 3 X 8 rule would take care of that "too much" issue. Maybe I am backwards but when I surf for Free Sites I typically hit the last gallery first and only go to a previous gallery if the last was really good...I'm not a very good prospect for porn though ;-)
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | ||
|
Arghhhh...submit yer sites ya ruddy swabs!
|
Quote:
Quote:
![]() |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Stupid risks make life worth living
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 381
|
I've think I've seen 'em all MrYum ;-)
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Screw you, guys. I'm going home.
|
I have no problem with 3 galleries but I'm sick of these all gay 5-gallery (24pics each) freesites.
I've banned dozens of domains but there are more comming my way every fucking day |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|