I got declined...

sickkittens · 2004-01-25, 02:37 PM

and the reason was "i do not accept tgp like galleries"

What's the difference between a TGP gallery and a free site gallery?

They pretty much look the same to me on alot of sites.

Cleo · 2004-01-25, 02:43 PM

"a TGP gallery"
This is one page of clickable thumbs.

"free site gallery"
This is a warning page that leads to a main page that leads to two galleries of clickable thumbs so four pages in total.

stuveltje · 2004-01-25, 02:43 PM

......some linksites accept free sites and no tgp gallery, free site = warning, main, gallery1 and gallery2.
tgp=one gallery

if they dont accept tgp galleries it means they dont accept a gallerie submit, big difference between a tgp gallerie or a free site, check the rules of a linksite it will tell you what they do accept

sickkittens · 2004-01-25, 02:48 PM

No, what I mean is I submitted the free site...warning, main, 2 galleries, etc. but they won't accept it because of the way the gallery pages look.

Strange.

Cleo · 2004-01-25, 02:51 PM

Post the URL of the site.

grzepa · 2004-01-25, 02:53 PM

Hm I think I know what you mean... probably you made a site with warning with main page and 2 galleries... but these galleries were taken straight from the free hosted sponsor galleries ... unchanged, with lots of graphics that ppl rarely use bulding gallerys from scratch.

I maybe wrong.

sickkittens · 2004-01-25, 02:58 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Cleo
Post the URL of the site.

http://www.sickkittens.com/fs/teensforcash/amateurs/

grzepa · 2004-01-25, 03:05 PM

Well that isnt what i thought it would be... no idea why you got declined...

grzepa · 2004-01-25, 03:13 PM

Well that isnt what i thought it would be... no idea why you got declined...

security_man · 2004-01-25, 04:14 PM

that content is pretty well used, maybe thats what got the rejection and they selected the wrong choice in the reason for rejection dropdown.

not sure tho

Surfn · 2004-01-25, 04:25 PM

It may be because you surrounded the banner with thumbs...

sickkittens · 2004-01-25, 05:46 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Surfn
It may be because you surrounded the banner with thumbs...

I didn't knwo that was a no-no

sickkittens · 2004-01-25, 05:47 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by security_man
that content is pretty well used, maybe thats what got the rejection and they selected the wrong choice in the reason for rejection dropdown.

not sure tho

Actually, I emailed them to ask for an explanation so it wasn;t an accidental drop down choice on their part.

dallasdeb · 2004-01-25, 06:48 PM

sickkittens, I personally rejected that site (you submitted a mirror to Adult Porn Guide) for the big blind link on the front page 'Teens Having Fun and Wild Sex' which goes straight to the sponsor.

I would suggest that may have been the main reason but other possible reasons you were rejected include
1. Overused sponsor content
2. Oversized main pics (yes they can be too big)
3. The index/front page and the rest of the site being in different directories
4. The title on the front page is not the same as the title inside the site (because of the different directories I imagine)
5. The title of the site is too similar to the sponsor
6. The link on the main page 'Visit TEENSFORCASH for more teens' is a bit dodgy, smells like a blind link
7. The links to 'free teens sites' and 'OTHER FREE TEENS SITES' go to a FPA that has no free teens sites on it, but has a link 'go 2 TEENSFORCASH for crazy sex' which is a link straight to the sponsor
8. All of the above

sickkittens · 2004-02-04, 12:46 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by dallasdeb
sickkittens, I personally rejected that site (you submitted a mirror to Adult Porn Guide) for the big blind link on the front page 'Teens Having Fun and Wild Sex' which goes straight to the sponsor.

I would suggest that may have been the main reason but other possible reasons you were rejected include
1. Overused sponsor content
2. Oversized main pics (yes they can be too big)
3. The index/front page and the rest of the site being in different directories
4. The title on the front page is not the same as the title inside the site (because of the different directories I imagine)
5. The title of the site is too similar to the sponsor
6. The link on the main page 'Visit TEENSFORCASH for more teens' is a bit dodgy, smells like a blind link
7. The links to 'free teens sites' and 'OTHER FREE TEENS SITES' go to a FPA that has no free teens sites on it, but has a link 'go 2 TEENSFORCASH for crazy sex' which is a link straight to the sponsor
8. All of the above

I always thought it was ok to have different Titles for each page?

dallasdeb · 2004-02-04, 07:58 PM

Quote:

I always thought it was ok to have different Titles for each page?

I am sure it is probably fine to do that, the fact that you had the warning page and the main page in different directories is what made it look suspicious. If you are going to do doorways my advice would be to at least have all pages in the same directory.

Kezza · 2004-02-05, 08:51 AM

SickKittens... there are a heap of link lists out there that may not be so pedantic... check them out and modify your recip tables accordingly

We all have different ideas about what is acceptable, you just need to find your style and find link lists that accommodate your style.

Good luck with you sites in the future

neo-gel · 2004-02-05, 09:24 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Surfn
It may be because you surrounded the banner with thumbs...

Why is this a problem?

Surfn · 2004-02-05, 10:00 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by neo-gel
Why is this a problem?

Because many tap's and LL owners don't like that. Some of them actually explain it in their rules. A few even give examples.

neo-gel · 2004-02-05, 10:24 AM

Oh I know it's in the rules of many sites.

I'm just trying to understand the logic behind that rule.

I can see it being a problem if the banner can be mistaken for a thumbs but other than that I'm at a loss to understand it.

Surfn · 2004-02-05, 11:07 AM

Their thinking ( and I agree) is for one thing it disturbs the flow of the gallery, but most importantly it creates a sort of blind link because surfers think it's part of the picture set. I know we all know different. But surfers are not webmasters.

Cleo · 2004-02-05, 11:31 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by neo-gel
Why is this a problem?

I decline for this.

It is bad design. It looks like you turned the thumbs into a frame for the ad.

The site IS about the content, NOT the ads. Your galleries are our content. It is content that makes the surfer come to our sites, not to look at your ads.

This isn't to say that we aren't doing this to make sales. Sales should be the only reason we do this, but it needs to be done right or there will not be any sales.

Entice the surfer, amuse the surfer, get the surfer excited and then sell them the sponsor.

Tricking the surfer or slamming them with ads is not going to result in sales.

Go out and buy some magazines and see how they design pages. Most magazines make most of their money from the ads, not from sales of the magazine so the magazine is about the selling ad space, but the person who bought it bought it for its content.

DangerDave · 2004-02-05, 05:59 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Cleo
The site IS about the content, NOT the ads. Your galleries are our content. It is content that makes the surfer come to our sites, not to look at your ads.

Amen Sister

backoffbitch · 2004-02-05, 06:02 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by dallasdeb
sickkittens, I personally rejected that site (you submitted a mirror to Adult Porn Guide) for the big blind link on the front page 'Teens Having Fun and Wild Sex' which goes straight to the sponsor.

That's hardly a blind link. There is no deception. No trickery, no lies. There ARE teens having wild sex in the site it links to.. so tell me something... What's wrong with this other than he may actualy get a sale from the warning page withought having to actualy see content?

My god, I run a link list myself and would never decline someone for that reason. However, the rest of your reasons have very good merit.

I just think alot of link lists owners have to stop telling webmasters what words to use in advertising. At this rate the only acceptable text link will be "Click here and you might be able to find a resemblance to this girl but you will have to have a credit card and it will cost you exactly $xx.xx to join and ignore everythign else I say on this site cause I am full fo myself and am taking advantage of link lists owners by wanting to actualy make money"

end rant.

DangerDave · 2004-02-05, 06:29 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by backoffbitch
That's hardly a blind link. There is no deception. No trickery, no lies.

It is 100% a deceptive link! especially when the surfer has come from a Link List that has listed the site as free, and the surfer hits that link, which looks like an entrance to the site.. and find themsleves at a pay site.

Not only will you not make a sale... you will reflect badly on the linklist that listed the site.

Quote:

Originally posted by backoffbitch
I just think alot of link lists owners have to stop telling webmasters what words to use in advertising.

No one is telling anyone what text to use..! LL owners are simply saying that if you want my traffic, then you have to follow my rules and submit sites of a certain quality.

You can blind link your ass off and pop consoles and auto install anything you like on your sites.. you just can't submit them to lists that have quality standards.

DD

2004-01-25, 02:37 PM	#1
sickkittens You can't keep blaming yourself. Just blame yourself once, and move on Join Date: Dec 2003 Posts: 353	I got declined... and the reason was "i do not accept tgp like galleries" What's the difference between a TGP gallery and a free site gallery? They pretty much look the same to me on alot of sites.

2004-01-25, 02:43 PM	#2
Cleo Subversive filth of the hedonistic decadent West Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Southeast Florida Posts: 27,936	"a TGP gallery" This is one page of clickable thumbs. "free site gallery" This is a warning page that leads to a main page that leads to two galleries of clickable thumbs so four pages in total. __________________ Free Rides on Uber and Lyft Uber Car: uberTzTerri Lyft Car: TZ896289

2004-01-25, 02:43 PM	#3
stuveltje Live and learn. And take very careful notes! Join Date: Apr 2003 Location: Sunny Holland Posts: 6,157	......some linksites accept free sites and no tgp gallery, free site = warning, main, gallery1 and gallery2. tgp=one gallery if they dont accept tgp galleries it means they dont accept a gallerie submit, big difference between a tgp gallerie or a free site, check the rules of a linksite it will tell you what they do accept __________________ Canadian Sexlinks - submit Erotica search -submit

2004-01-25, 02:51 PM	#5
Cleo Subversive filth of the hedonistic decadent West Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Southeast Florida Posts: 27,936	Post the URL of the site. __________________ Free Rides on Uber and Lyft Uber Car: uberTzTerri Lyft Car: TZ896289

2004-01-25, 02:53 PM	#6
grzepa You can now put whatever you want in this space :) Join Date: Nov 2003 Posts: 980	Hm I think I know what you mean... probably you made a site with warning with main page and 2 galleries... but these galleries were taken straight from the free hosted sponsor galleries ... unchanged, with lots of graphics that ppl rarely use bulding gallerys from scratch. I maybe wrong. __________________ RATIOS SUCK ? - TRY REALITYCASH !

2004-01-25, 02:48 PM	#4
sickkittens You can't keep blaming yourself. Just blame yourself once, and move on Join Date: Dec 2003 Posts: 353	No, what I mean is I submitted the free site...warning, main, 2 galleries, etc. but they won't accept it because of the way the gallery pages look. Strange.

2004-01-25, 03:05 PM	#8
grzepa You can now put whatever you want in this space :) Join Date: Nov 2003 Posts: 980	Well that isnt what i thought it would be... no idea why you got declined... __________________ RATIOS SUCK ? - TRY REALITYCASH !

2004-01-25, 03:13 PM	#9
grzepa You can now put whatever you want in this space :) Join Date: Nov 2003 Posts: 980	Well that isnt what i thought it would be... no idea why you got declined... __________________ RATIOS SUCK ? - TRY REALITYCASH !

2004-01-25, 04:14 PM	#10
security_man Are you sure this is the Sci-Fi Convention? It's full of nerds! Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Texas Posts: 260	that content is pretty well used, maybe thats what got the rejection and they selected the wrong choice in the reason for rejection dropdown. not sure tho __________________ <a href="http://www.linkalotapuss.com/home.php" target="_blank"><font face="Trebuchet MS">Linkalotapuss.com</a> - Submit your sites</font>

2004-01-25, 04:25 PM	#11
Surfn If you don’t take a chance the Angels won’t dance Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: Earth on occasion Posts: 8,812	It may be because you surrounded the banner with thumbs...

2004-01-25, 06:48 PM	#14
dallasdeb Ahhh ... sweet pity. Where would my love life be without it? Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: Australia Posts: 207	sickkittens, I personally rejected that site (you submitted a mirror to Adult Porn Guide) for the big blind link on the front page 'Teens Having Fun and Wild Sex' which goes straight to the sponsor. I would suggest that may have been the main reason but other possible reasons you were rejected include 1. Overused sponsor content 2. Oversized main pics (yes they can be too big) 3. The index/front page and the rest of the site being in different directories 4. The title on the front page is not the same as the title inside the site (because of the different directories I imagine) 5. The title of the site is too similar to the sponsor 6. The link on the main page 'Visit TEENSFORCASH for more teens' is a bit dodgy, smells like a blind link 7. The links to 'free teens sites' and 'OTHER FREE TEENS SITES' go to a FPA that has no free teens sites on it, but has a link 'go 2 TEENSFORCASH for crazy sex' which is a link straight to the sponsor 8. All of the above __________________ Link to our Free Hosted Sites and Galleries

2004-02-05, 08:51 AM	#17
Kezza 24 hours in a day, 24 beers in a case. Coincidence? I think NOT! Join Date: Apr 2003 Location: Australia Posts: 559	SickKittens... there are a heap of link lists out there that may not be so pedantic... check them out and modify your recip tables accordingly We all have different ideas about what is acceptable, you just need to find your style and find link lists that accommodate your style. Good luck with you sites in the future __________________ Kezza Now This IS Groovy Free Porn

2004-02-05, 10:24 AM	#20
neo-gel Are you sure you're an accredited and honored pornographer? Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Land of beer, cheese, and brats Posts: 64	Oh I know it's in the rules of many sites. I'm just trying to understand the logic behind that rule. I can see it being a problem if the banner can be mistaken for a thumbs but other than that I'm at a loss to understand it.

2004-02-05, 11:07 AM	#21
Surfn If you don’t take a chance the Angels won’t dance Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: Earth on occasion Posts: 8,812	Their thinking ( and I agree) is for one thing it disturbs the flow of the gallery, but most importantly it creates a sort of blind link because surfers think it's part of the picture set. I know we all know different. But surfers are not webmasters.