Some Linklists go a bit to far :P

[AliMeBitch]

Every once and a while my site gets rejected for the banners, some i can completely understand cuz it looks like a clickable thumbnail, but then there is the times where i get rejected because of the banner that has images in it that so what called look like clickable thumbnails, if anybody mistoke that for one of the thumbs on the site they should be brought out back and shot like a horse with a broken leg and why would you want that stupid of people to be on your link list, they are obviously so dumb they couldnt be working and afford to pay for porn, so who cares if they leave thinking your misleading them. Here is my one site that got rejected at one link list Blonde Bed Strip due to gallery 2 and the banner between the images, I dont know how anybody could think that is blind or misleading. Im not getting mad or upset at anyone, im just saying that sometimes the rules can go a bit to far and we are all in this for the money, Ive never cheated nor will I Cheat because I believe everybody should have the same chance of succeeding. Anyways let me know your thoughts on this.

[AliMeBitch]

no reply at all???? |viking|

[Wild_Unicorn]

I can see why that would be deemed as blind. Do your thumbs necessarily need to be the same colour as the banner though?

By making them a diferent colour or border thickness would make it look like a banner and not thumbs - Just a thought...

[AliMeBitch]

Well I can almost see it, but really there is not anything solid there to make it look like a thumbnail

[Wild_Unicorn]

To be honest if you only got one rejection for having it .... don't worry about it.

If you only got one you did well!

[AliMeBitch]

Well im not bitching that I didnt get listed, I was just stating that yeah everybody else accepted that site no problems, but there is always 1 or 2 that go a little over the top for what they consider misleading.

[Lemmy]

If it's the same 1-2 LLs that constantly give you grief, revise your submit list. There's no shortage of LLs to submit to and you're never gonna make everybody happy all the time.

Personally I wouldn't use the banner in question as I know from experience it wouldn't sit well with many reviewers.

[Blnt]

Originally Posted by AliMeBitch

Well im not bitching that I didnt get listed, I was just stating that yeah everybody else accepted that site no problems, but there is always 1 or 2 that go a little over the top for what they consider misleading.

True...

I don't think that 'surfers' are so stupid or horny to keep their dick in one hand and mouse in other and clik everywhere where they see some piece of naked pussy ot tit, am i wrong?
However, a lot of people use 'thumnail' banners in wrong way and they got rejected, so is better not to use them at all.

[ladydesigner]

That's a nice looking site but that banner does look like clickable thumbs to me (so does the one on the main page).

[Cleo]

Looks like a clickable thumb to me.

[stuveltje]

some banners are realy a doubt If they look like "clickable thumb" even i know its a banner,so if the rule is: all what look like a "thumb or pic small or big" in a banner will be declined " it will be declined at some linksites for clickable thumb or blind link, i myself avoid those banners also when i make a free sites or i change the banners by putting some text on the "clickable thumbs"

[Cleo]

I find that I often need to add a bit of text to banners so that they don't look like clickable thumbs. I blame the designers that make these banners.

[MrMaryLou]

Their site, their traffic

[Ramster]

That is borderline honestly. If the rest of the site is clean and the pics are fresh then I'd let it go. But if it's sponsor content and the site had other "borderline" things then I'd reject it.

[Useless]

Those thumb-like banners throw off your ratios anyway. People who accidentally click thru to a sponsor, even if it is just them being dumb, tend to feel as if you have done something underhanded to get them there. It's just best to avoid those banners. If I owned a program, I wouldn't pay for banners like that, knowing that most webmasters can't use them.

[Alphawolf]

It's probably because they have a hard edge around the two outter pics with a bit of white space. The fact that they are "framed" with a bit of space can make someone think they are maybe part of your pics.

[amadman]

I would say those fit under the blind looking thumb rule.

Especially how the thumbs parts are are devided from the banner part and almost under the gallery links on the main page.

[ChristyB]

The main page is a bigger problem for imo... The "thumbs" are almost under the gallery links and a lot of free site builders add thumbs linked to their galleries just below their gallery links (which is obviously fine).... thing being that an experienced porn surfer might easily click those thumbs expecting to enter the galleries!

[stuveltje]

ah if i am right i am the one who rejected you at ************** for misleading banners, i have to draw a line somewhere and yes they looked for me at clickable thumbs, i am sorry if you didnt like that, but it are rules.

[AliMeBitch]

thats no problem, its just my personal opinion versus yours, im not complaining, but i have had some sites where it was almost anything that had a pic on it was considered to look like a clickable thumb, i dropped them cuz it was useless trying to make sites to fit there credentials, you guys approve 99% of my sites and im thankful for that. It happens, out of all the places I submit there are always a couple that get rejected for one reason or another.