|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#14 |
|
If something goes wrong at the plant, blame the guy who can't speak English
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 39
|
I think the bare minimum features would be (in addition to manual reviewing and listing of links, of course):
- Static pages (not dynamic) - Recip checker - Duplicate checker - Broken link checker - Blacklist controls Nothing too fancy. Many of the cheaper and even free scripts can do all this EXCEPT the first bullet. Ultimately THAT's what I'll be paying for. I don't really see much point in a Link List if its not SE friendly. In researching I've seen a lot of sites that are built on feature-rich scripts but don't utilize most of the fancier user features the script offers (reviews, ratings, report broken link, added on [date], hits, etc). I assume they got the more advanced script for the admin functionality and NOT the user functionality... so if a developer is looking for one spot to trim fat the best bet would probably be to trim the fancier user functionality and leave as much admin as possible. Just my 2 cents. - uterpie
__________________
Sign up for multi-niche traffic trading and gallery submitting at All the Free Porn |
|
|
|
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|