Democrat Expected to Take Aim at Online Porn, Introduce 25% Tax on Adult Website Sale

tickler · 2005-07-20, 01:14 AM

Now call me reaching, but, I can almost see a good side to it.

Like every other "sin tax", the government has. They end up getting addicted to the revenue. Just look at alcohol, look at tobacco, look at lotteries. All not good for you, and the tax dollars keep on rolling in.

Do it for porn, and they might actually stop trying to outlaw it.

Maj. Stress · 2005-07-20, 02:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tickler

Now call me reaching, but, I can almost see a good side to it.

Like every other "sin tax", the government has. They end up getting addicted to the revenue. Just look at alcohol, look at tobacco, look at lotteries. All not good for you, and the tax dollars keep on rolling in.

Do it for porn, and they might actually stop trying to outlaw it.

I wouldn't be to sure about that. The government has been collecting mega tax dollars for years from the tobacco industry. Then the pricks turned around and sued them for billions more. Now, who has made more "profit" from the sale of tobacco?

Linkster · 2005-07-20, 07:19 AM

Someone introduces a bill like this every three months- and every session of congress these get dumped - they dont want to "legalize" or show that porn is a viable biz to their constituents.

Secondly - the people that put these stories out in adult WM newsletters are just trying to sensationalize just like they did with 2257 - scare the masses into doing something stupid - damn sheep

Surfn · 2005-07-20, 07:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Linkster

Someone introduces a bill like this every three months- and every session of congress these get dumped - they dont want to "legalize" or show that porn is a viable biz to their constituents.

Secondly - the people that put these stories out in adult WM newsletters are just trying to sensationalize just like they did with 2257 - scare the masses into doing something stupid - damn sheep

Once again we find ourselves on the same page

tickler · 2005-07-21, 06:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Linkster

...they dont want to "legalize" or show that porn is a viable biz to their constituents.

THX Linkster, That was the point I was trying to make about it maybe could be a good thing.

2005-07-20, 01:14 AM	#1
tickler If there is nobody out there, that's a lot of real estate going to waste! Join Date: Dec 2003 Posts: 2,177	Now call me reaching, but, I can almost see a good side to it. Like every other "sin tax", the government has. They end up getting addicted to the revenue. Just look at alcohol, look at tobacco, look at lotteries. All not good for you, and the tax dollars keep on rolling in. Do it for porn, and they might actually stop trying to outlaw it. __________________ Latina Twins, Solo, NN, Hardcore Latin Teen Cash

2005-07-20, 07:19 AM	#3
Linkster NO! Im not a female - but being a dragon, I do eat them. Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Sex Delta Posts: 5,084	Someone introduces a bill like this every three months- and every session of congress these get dumped - they dont want to "legalize" or show that porn is a viable biz to their constituents. Secondly - the people that put these stories out in adult WM newsletters are just trying to sensationalize just like they did with 2257 - scare the masses into doing something stupid - damn sheep __________________ Pussy Chompers Porn Links NSCash

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version Email this Page	Search this Thread: Advanced Search
Display Modes	Rate This Thread
Switch to Linear Mode Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode	Rate This Thread: