Free site attempt

[Loganp8000]

Originally Posted by Halfdeck

You don't need to, but its an option some free site builders prefer. For one its one less traffic leak on the page. It's also another link a reviewer has to check; some cheaters put ads in their 2257 page or might redirect the link after submission.

I thought I had to by law have the words 2257 compliance statement with a link to my compliance info. What are you suggesting? Just put http://www.laurensands.com/compliance.html and dont link it to that page? Seems like I would be out of compliance then, no?

I tell ya, cheaters have made my life so much harder, I want to start a collective of ninja hackers to give these people what they need. My foot up there ass!!!

ALOHA, thank you for the tips.

[MrYum]

Originally Posted by Loganp8000

I thought I had to by law have the words 2257 compliance statement with a link to my compliance info. What are you suggesting? Just put http://www.laurensands.com/compliance.html and dont link it to that page? Seems like I would be out of compliance then, no?

I tell ya, cheaters have made my life so much harder, I want to start a collective of ninja hackers to give these people what they need. My foot up there ass!!!

ALOHA, thank you for the tips.

Opinions vary on linking or not linking the 2257. Personally, when I do free sites...I do link it...to a plain white page with just the info...nothing else. Perhaps a slight traffic leak, but nothing there for a surfer to see...so I don't worry about that leakage.

Yes, the scammers/cheats/ASSHOLES have made things much more difficult for everyone

If you find those ninjas...lemme know...I'll chip in for their fees

[Loganp8000]

Yes, the scammers/cheats/ASSHOLES have made things much more difficult for everyone

If you find those ninjas...lemme know...I'll chip in for their fees

Dont be surprised when i take you up on that! HEHE
ALOHA

[MrYum]

Originally Posted by Loganp8000

Dont be surprised when i take you up on that! HEHE
ALOHA

... fix yer sig