Pornography Jurisdiction Limitation Act

[juggernaut]

Originally Posted by Surfn

I do and I did vote. Just not republican. Sorry I can't make this any clearer.


I find it very interesting that hardly anyone admits to voting for the current regime but someone did. People who know me know I came out against the current regime in primaries.

I voted for him. I admit it and I have no shame in it. I am not a fan of Clinton, never was. Not that Bush was running against him but shit his totum pole flunky was running. The guy cheats on his wife 3 times that we know of lies to the public about it and then turns blow jobs into a non-sexual act. Part of his life style is whats causing us problems. 8 years of being a perv freaked out the religous nuts who now have come out in full force against anything sexual. Why did I vote for Bush? Simple my military job. I got tired of sitting on chairs that had wires sticking out of the seat and poked holes in my legs because the last president felt we did not need any money at all. So no money for new chairs or anything. Plus I got more rasies when Bush got in office.
I vote and always will. It's the only thing that gives me a voice. Sure you can go and march on washington but that rarly does any good now. Hell everyday you go there someone is marching for something. The main problem we have is simple. NO ONE IN CONGRESS READS THE LAWS THEY ARE PASSING. There should be a law against that. If you are in congress you can not pass a law until proof is shown you have read and understood the law. Sure less laws would be passed but the ones that make it would prob be common sense ones.

[karomesis]

I'm anti-ignorance, a plauge that seems to be affecting more and more these days. It is a case of the blind leading the blind. The party is irrelevant, it is the final outcome that matters.

Games are for children, yet politicians play them everyday; they realize that there are many fools who will listen and believe their lies, time and time again, so they continue to tell them.

They dabble in machiavellianism, but cry foul when others do the same. Wanna play hardball? let's play.


"There is nothing more difficult to take in hand, more perilous to conduct, or more uncertain in its success, than to take the lead in the introduction of a new order of things. "- niccolo machiavelli

[tickler]

Originally Posted by juggernaut

The main problem we have is simple. NO ONE IN CONGRESS READS THE LAWS THEY ARE PASSING. There should be a law against that. If you are in congress you can not pass a law until proof is shown you have read and understood the law. Sure less laws would be passed but the ones that make it would prob be common sense ones.

Maybe they should make it an offence to create dumb laws, something like how they are trying to rein in those who file stupid lawsuits.