Are These New Piece Of Shit Options Now Standard In NATS?

[BadWolf]

I've seen more than one thread before bashing both NATS and CCBill. When it comes to trust I accept that there are issues with both. Personally, I prefer NATS and I also find many sponsors that use CCbill to be inferior especially regarding promotional material but that's life.

[Greenguy]

Originally Posted by BadWolf

... and I also find many sponsors that use CCbill to be inferior especially regarding promotional material but that's life.

Believe me when I say that there is nothing in NATS as far as promotional material that you can't do with CCBill or any other admin.

And, there's a lot of programs that use NATS that have fuck all for promo material.

Promo material has everything to do with the program owner & nothing to do with the affiliate software.

[BadWolf]

Originally Posted by Greenie

Believe me when I say that there is nothing in NATS as far as promotional material that you can't do with CCBill or any other admin.

And, there's a lot of programs that use NATS that have fuck all for promo material.

Promo material has everything to do with the program owner & nothing to do with the affiliate software.

I understand that. I just have seen so many small amateur sites that use CCBill that do not bother to put together any promotional materials that I almost literally groan when I see them asking for my CCBill affilate code when I click on the 'webmasters' link. That's not CCBills' fault in any way but it definitely creates a Pavlovian response in me.

It's not the end of the world, it's just more work for me if I choose to promote that sponsor. I guess it's more of an issue for me as I'm ending up promoting more and more small niche sponsors.

My point, which I should have made more clear, was that I deal with both CCBill and NATS whether I or not a get a warm glow from the experience.