|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Rating:
|
Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
If there is nobody out there, that's a lot of real estate going to waste!
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,177
|
My little 2¢ on this stuff.
So one of my sponsors that I have quite a few referrals on under ccBill. switched to NATs. Although they are maintaining all the old linking for ccBill(for now). All WMs need to signup again under NATs for access to promo, and linking codes. From what I have been able to determine so far, my WMs referrals will no longer be tracked under the new system. Great way to gain an extra 10% income for the sponsor by screwing the WMs out of their referrals commision. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
The Original Greenguy (Est'd 1996) & AVN HOF Member - I Crop Pics For Thumbs In My Sleep
|
Quote:
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Searching for Jimmy Hoffa
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 771
|
Very interesting thread indeed.
I don't really have a problem with Nats itself, more or less it's just another bit of software. What I do have a problem with is the hype that surrounded it when it got released and how many sponsors jumped on the nats bandwagon and used that as some sort of "cheat-proof" inducement to get affiliates to pump traffic to them. Now that the hype period has ended, look through your stats, are you doing better with ratio wise with sponsors that use Nats? Or have you found the opposite to be true? Personally, I found the opposite to be true...right now the top 10 sponsors I use none of them are on Nats. Doesn't mean I won't try sponsors using nats...it just means they better perform up to my other sponsors or they're getting dropped quick. |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|