This whole directnic locking down a domain thing

Windy City · 2007-01-02, 12:58 PM

I understand that they were trying to cover for themselves. I just don't get why they didn't simply tell him that they no longer want to be his registrar and that he has 72 hours to transfer his domains elsewhere. Then also report it to the proper authorities.

That just seems like a much better solution than trying to police it themselves. Technically, isn't it better to have the authorities determine what is legal and not a registrar?

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version Email this Page	Search this Thread: Advanced Search
Display Modes	Rate This Thread
Switch to Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Threaded Mode	Rate This Thread:

2007-01-02, 12:58 PM	#28
Windy City Internet! Is that thing still around? Join Date: Jan 2007 Posts: 6	I understand that they were trying to cover for themselves. I just don't get why they didn't simply tell him that they no longer want to be his registrar and that he has 72 hours to transfer his domains elsewhere. Then also report it to the proper authorities. That just seems like a much better solution than trying to police it themselves. Technically, isn't it better to have the authorities determine what is legal and not a registrar?