Move to ban animal porn

[Surfn]

To me this issue is a "no brainer"

[virgohippy]

Originally Posted by Cleo

Yeah it's so much better to kill them and eat their flesh then to be having sex with them.

Exactly my sentiments.

[kenny]

I'd fuck it.. I mean eat it

[lassiter]

Originally Posted by Linkster

Well - I guess if they ban it in Europe people could always move to Texas where its still legal

AHEM!

It's only acceptable in Texas as part of fraternity initiations.

[Linkster]

I should have really covered everyone - its NOT against the law to have sex with an animal in 23 states in the US

Of course then there is the little problem of the state of Washington where its illegal to have sex with a virgin - even on your wedding night

[Tommy]

Originally Posted by Linkster

Of course then there is the little problem of the state of Washington where its illegal to have sex with a virgin - even on your wedding night

Linkster you sound as if you dont approve of the law in washington

maybe they want women to disvirgin themselves with big bright blue dildos

maybe its an inncentive to help the latex industry and create jobs in this country (didnt think of that did ya)

[Linkster]

Tommy Actually thought of setting up a service in Oregon just over the state line to help all those virgins (well the female ones anyway) avoid run-ins with the law I wouldnt charge much

[oldbrad]

I got that covered linkster

[Trixie]

Oh god. Call me a freak, but if an animal isn't hurt (and the animal belongs to you -- you didn't trespass into someone else's barn or whatever as was the case in Enumclaw) then it shouldn't be against the law. If someone wants to commit suicide by horse cock, more power to them.

It's totally ridiculous that people can breed animals (have you ever seen some of the cruel shit that often goes on in this process?), clone them, butcher them, do testing on them . . . but suck a horse's dick or have a dog lick peanut butter off your pussy? OH GOD!!!! SOMEONE CALL THE POLICE!!! It may be gross and cross most people's boundaries of decency, but it's not something the law should interfere with.

Anyone who eats meat, buys pets from breeders, wears leather, etc. and then tries to make bestiality illegal on principle only is a gigantic hypocrite. It's a fake issue.

[oldbrad]

I eat hamburgers. I don't fuck em.

[FanTC]

Originally Posted by Trixie

Oh god. Call me a freak, but if an animal isn't hurt (and the animal belongs to you -- you didn't trespass into someone else's barn or whatever as was the case in Enumclaw) then it shouldn't be against the law. If someone wants to commit suicide by horse cock, more power to them.

It's totally ridiculous that people can breed animals (have you ever seen some of the cruel shit that often goes on in this process?), clone them, butcher them, do testing on them . . . but suck a horse's dick or have a dog lick peanut butter off your pussy? OH GOD!!!! SOMEONE CALL THE POLICE!!! It may be gross and cross most people's boundaries of decency, but it's not something the law should interfere with.

Anyone who eats meat, buys pets from breeders, wears leather, etc. and then tries to make bestiality illegal on principle only is a gigantic hypocrite. It's a fake issue.

Obviously, you , my dear, are a fucking retard.

[Trixie]

Originally Posted by FanTC

Obviously, you , my dear, are a fucking retard.

If any person in favor of anti-bestiality (where no animal is physically harmed) laws can come up with a morsel of rational justification for them (right alongside rationale for why doing sexual things with animals is somehow much crueler and more criminal than any of those other things I mentioned) then I'll gladly consign myself to the "retard" pile. Otherwise I think you, "my dear", are the retard for not coming up with anything better than that.

Unfortunately this is one of those issues where people are totally irrational -- it has nothing to do with caring about animals or even people, and has everything to do with a hysterical fear of sex.

Whatever, though. I realize this is one of those issues where people can't have a logical argument because they're so afraid everyone will label them sickos and perverts . . . and retards . . . if they use their brains for half a second. If no animal is hurt and the only humans that are hurt consented to it, then it's a victimless crime.

By the by, I do think the first guy to get in trouble here in WA since the law was passed TOTALLY deserved it; he was fucking a dog and totally hurting it. Of course, the animal CRUELTY laws should be sufficient to prosecute these kinds of assholes, though.

[2mmy]

People are weird all over the world. Even presidents go out hunting, as in KILLING animals, i think thats much much worse then having sex with...

whats worse killing or having sex with them...?

[Saturnin]

I think you guys are forgetting that it's the Dutch government which is talking about banning this. For these clowns, it's one of their best ideas to date.

Then again, you can make any kind of joke you want about the local government screwing the taxpayer like a farmer from region (fill in the blank) on his favourite sheep.

[oldbrad]

"If any person in favor of anti-bestiality (where no animal is physically harmed) laws can come up with a morsel of rational justification for them (right alongside rationale for why doing sexual things with animals is somehow much crueler and more criminal than any of those other things I mentioned) then I'll gladly consign myself to the "retard" pile. Otherwise I think you, "my dear", are the retard for not coming up with anything better than that."

Imagine you were at home fucking your golden retriever and got knocked up? Can you imagine the social stigma created by your action that the poor dog-boy (or girl respectively) would have to go thru for years to come?

Just say no to fucking animals

[Cleo]

I wonder if Panda Porn makes any humans horny or even worse hungry for a Panda steak?

[FanTC]

Originally Posted by Trixie

I realize this is one of those issues where people can't have a logical argument because they're so afraid everyone will label them sickos and perverts . . . and retards . . . if they use their brains for half a second. If no animal is hurt and the only humans that are hurt consented to it, then it's a victimless crime.

You know, I've done alot of drugs in my time, but not once have I ever had even the briefest flash of genius to decide to reach over and grab my cat and impale her on my cock. I've even had trips where cows were running 75mph alongside the vehicle I was in. Did it excite me? Absolutely, scared the hell out of me. Did I want to fuck it? Newp!


While technology has advanced by leaps and bounds in modern history, there is far too much that we don't know about the world and how everything works. The human brain, for instance, is still very much a mystery. We may never tap it to the full extent. And being such, we haven't even begun to understand the animal brain other than dolphins, primates, and a few others. So how are you so sure it's a victimless crime?

What if, just what if, despite their lack of fingers and toes and the ability to walk upright, those animals brains are developed more than we realize? We seem to have come up with excuses for every type of mental illness and flaw in humans... ADD, ADHD, etc., so how do you know the emotional process of the animals isn't affected. Maybe the animals are sent spiraling into an abyssmal depression and long for the slaughter, much like abused people becoming suicidal. Their primitive communication skills prevent them from expressing their desire to not be used as a sexual tool, however you assume it's ok? What's next, Invalids?

Since we don't know, all discussion is strictly opinion and will remain as such until we have definitive proof one way or the other. I'd say it boils down to personal ethics and discretion. Being as I have a choice, I choose not to associate with or put myself in the position to be affiliated with anyone of that ilk.

I personally don't give 3 shits in a shoebox who screws what and I'm willing to turn a blind eye to much more than I'd like to, however, in a perfect world I'd recieve the same consideration when I opted to gouge animal fuckers and their advocates' eyes out with a t-bone.

[LowryBigwood]

Originally Posted by Trixie

If no animal is hurt and the only humans that are hurt consented to it, then it's a victimless crime.

Are you fucking kidding me?

[Cleo]

Some things are worth repeating.

Originally Posted by Cleo

Yeah it's so much better to kill them and eat their flesh then to be having sex with them.

It's hypocritical to believe that it is ok to kill them and eat their flesh but having sex with them is wrong.

BTW, I've been a vegetarian most of my life. I don't have sex with animals because I think it is wrong, I also have yet to get turned on by anything other then a human animal, and I also don't eat them because I think it is wrong but until the time comes when animals are no longer slaughtered because some like to eat their flesh I find it really pointless to be concerned about having sex with one.

[Trixie]

Originally Posted by FanTC

You know, I've done alot of drugs in my time, but not once have I ever had even the briefest flash of genius to decide to reach over and grab my cat and impale her on my cock. I've even had trips where cows were running 75mph alongside the vehicle I was in. Did it excite me? Absolutely, scared the hell out of me. Did I want to fuck it? Newp!


While technology has advanced by leaps and bounds in modern history, there is far too much that we don't know about the world and how everything works. The human brain, for instance, is still very much a mystery. We may never tap it to the full extent. And being such, we haven't even begun to understand the animal brain other than dolphins, primates, and a few others. So how are you so sure it's a victimless crime?

What if, just what if, despite their lack of fingers and toes and the ability to walk upright, those animals brains are developed more than we realize? We seem to have come up with excuses for every type of mental illness and flaw in humans... ADD, ADHD, etc., so how do you know the emotional process of the animals isn't affected. Maybe the animals are sent spiraling into an abyssmal depression and long for the slaughter, much like abused people becoming suicidal. Their primitive communication skills prevent them from expressing their desire to not be used as a sexual tool, however you assume it's ok? What's next, Invalids?

Since we don't know, all discussion is strictly opinion and will remain as such until we have definitive proof one way or the other. I'd say it boils down to personal ethics and discretion. Being as I have a choice, I choose not to associate with or put myself in the position to be affiliated with anyone of that ilk.

I personally don't give 3 shits in a shoebox who screws what and I'm willing to turn a blind eye to much more than I'd like to, however, in a perfect world I'd recieve the same consideration when I opted to gouge animal fuckers and their advocates' eyes out with a t-bone.

I hear what you're saying, but it doesn't stand up alongside the other animals-are-here-to-serve-humans stuff like farming for meat, animal testing, etc. I mean, do you also want to gouge out the eyes of cattle ranchers? Scientists who torture and kill animals in labs?

I'm not ADVOCATING bestiality or saying that it's normal and perfectly cool -- no, I think in most cases it's pathologically insane and horrid and there are good reasons why it's taboo. What I'm advocating is laws (and arguments) that make sense.

[Trixie]

Originally Posted by LowryBigwood

Are you fucking kidding me?

Dude, NO I'm not kidding you. Do you think a dog is a victim if it licks peanut butter off some guy's asshole but (as one example) a calf is NOT a victim if it's trapped in a tiny cage its whole life and slaughtered young so it won't develop any muscle and will become tender yummy veal for people to get sensual pleasure from eating?

[LowryBigwood]

Hello Cleo,

Originally Posted by Cleo

Some things are worth repeating.

It's hypocritical to believe that it is ok to kill them and eat their flesh but having sex with them is wrong.

That's not true. However, it would be hypocritical of someone to say they are against nailing their dog in the ass while doing it themselves.

[LowryBigwood]

Originally Posted by Trixie

Do you think a dog is a victim if it licks peanut butter off some guy's asshole

Uhh Yeah...

Originally Posted by Trixie

but a calf is NOT a victim if it's trapped in a tiny cage its whole life and slaughtered young so it won't develop any muscle and will become tender yummy veal for people to get sensual pleasure from eating?

So you are trying to justify having sex with animals because some of us choose to eat meat in our diets? Do I have this correct or maybe I misunderstood what you are trying to compare this to?

[oldbrad]

"It's hypocritical to believe that it is ok to kill them and eat their flesh but having sex with them is wrong."

I may be a murdering meateater, but i'm no rapist.

[Cleo]

I have a Brazilian friend who is bisexual. There was a time when the two of us would mess around with a guy friend of ours. Then I found out that she lets her dog lick her pussy. I no longer will have sex with her due to this but I fail to see how she is harming her dog.