|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
![]() |
#8 |
Jim? I heard he's a dirty pornographer.
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 2,706
|
I don't think that there is enough evidence to win an impeachment proceeding so it's very risky. Nancy Pelosi is much smarter then people think.
1. If the democrats start the process and it doesn't finish by the time he leaves office any way then what do you have? 2. If the dems start the process and the evidence is weak then the dems look bad. 3. In an election year the republicans will keep complaining that the dems are wasting time. 4. Kucinich is now running for President. His motives are single minded. The only advantage to impeaching the Dick is that it may keep him side lined long enough to avoid an Iranian conflict. Fox News spent more time then any other cable channel talking about Paris in prison and Brittney's issues. The neocons like the idea of a sex scandal and that's why they were all over that. Sending soldiers to their death is not as interesting as blow jobs. Impeaching won't help win the next election. |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|