New CCBill Admin - Discuss

[CCBill_Paul]

Originally Posted by Greenie

It's not so much what I see in the admin, it's how I link to the program's sites. When I posted that 581222 is my Amateur facials number, that means that I can easily search my link list & TGP data files for 581222 if I need to find all the Amateur Facial links.

But if I have to link to all the programs & all the sites using 1 code/number, that'll make it very difficult to find the links for just one program.

Follow?

Yes, yes I follow. It is going to take some getting used to and the links will not be quite as distinguishable but the new links will still be unique to each sponsor.

for example, sponsor A's links may look like this: http://wms.ccbill.com/wmsi/w_id/Lt-r...iLvJPZb2tsWMs*

While sponsor B's may look like this:

http://wms.ccbill.com/wmsi/w_id/Lt-K...SLvJPZb2tsWMs*

So, while they will not be as easily identified as the old ones you will still be able to associate one link with one program.

I hope that helps.

[tickler]

Originally Posted by CCBill_Paul

Yes, yes I follow. It is going to take some getting used to and the links will not be quite as distinguishable but the new links will still be unique to each sponsor.

for example, sponsor A's links may look like this: http://wms.ccbill.com/wmsi/w_id/Lt-r...iLvJPZb2tsWMs*

While sponsor B's may look like this:

http://wms.ccbill.com/wmsi/w_id/Lt-K...SLvJPZb2tsWMs*

So, while they will not be as easily identified as the old ones you will still be able to associate one link with one program.

I hope that helps.

I'm going to presume that there are sponsor/site/affiliate IDs encoded(base64???) buried in that mess somewhere.

I think question is if he can easily pull one individual sponsors' sites out of links databases.

Also, please tell me that sponsors will have to use sub-account coding for their individual sites with the new linking codes.

[CCBill_Paul]

Originally Posted by tickler

I'm going to presume that there are sponsor/site/affiliate IDs encoded(base64???) buried in that mess somewhere.

I think question is if he can easily pull one individual sponsors' sites out of links databases.

I think you will be able to easily pull an individual sponsor's link(s), it may however, be a little more difficult than it was before.

Originally Posted by tickler

Also, please tell me that sponsors will have to use sub-account coding for their individual sites with the new linking codes.

This will really depend on the sponsors settings, as it did before.

[kit]

Originally Posted by CCBill_Paul

for example, sponsor A's links may look like this: http://wms.ccbill.com/wmsi/w_id/Lt-r...iLvJPZb2tsWMs*

While sponsor B's may look like this:

http://wms.ccbill.com/wmsi/w_id/Lt-K...SLvJPZb2tsWMs*

So, while they will not be as easily identified as the old ones you will still be able to associate one link with one program.

I hope that helps.

Another "NATS encoding" crap?
The worse thing I ever seen is encoded affiliate links.

Paul, do you discussed your new features with valued webmasters before official pressrelease?

[Cleo]

Originally Posted by kit

The worse thing I ever seen is encoded affiliate links.

I would have to agree with Kit on that.