|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1 | |
|
Subversive filth of the hedonistic decadent West
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Southeast Florida
Posts: 27,936
|
I still think the huge concrete containment domes over US nuclear plants in the US, like the ones at Turkey Point south of me, offer far more protection than the secondary steel vessels around the Japanese ones. I know that I don't worry about the ones south of me and hope they go ahead with plans to add two more.
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Lonewolf Internet Sales
|
The only issue I have with building more nuclear plants is the disposal of the spent fuel. They still haven't figured that out, and in the mean time, it sits in pools accumulating.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Subversive filth of the hedonistic decadent West
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Southeast Florida
Posts: 27,936
|
I think there is already a solution, big hole deep underground, but the public won't agree on anything so as a result it sits in "temporally" pools.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Selling porn allows me to stay in a constant state of Bliss - ain't that a trip!
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 3,914
|
The small format reactors are interesting, but I've yet to see really convincing working prototypes - has anyone else?
I thought the pebble bed reactor concept was interesting too. As I understood it tho, uranium is the limiting factor for a nuclear electricity economy. There's enough uranium for a while, but of we wanted to produce planetary scale amounts of nuclear electricity the struggle for uranium would relatively quickly mirror the current competition for oil. The proposed solution is a plutonium economy based on breeder reactors - and a plutonium economy has a lot of scary problems asscoiated with it. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
NO! Im not a female - but being a dragon, I do eat them.
|
Actually most plants have instituted their own storage vaults on-site that gets the fuel out of the pools into a dry storage cask
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|