|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Lonewolf Internet Sales
|
The only issue I have with building more nuclear plants is the disposal of the spent fuel. They still haven't figured that out, and in the mean time, it sits in pools accumulating.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Subversive filth of the hedonistic decadent West
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Southeast Florida
Posts: 27,936
|
I think there is already a solution, big hole deep underground, but the public won't agree on anything so as a result it sits in "temporally" pools.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Selling porn allows me to stay in a constant state of Bliss - ain't that a trip!
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 3,914
|
The small format reactors are interesting, but I've yet to see really convincing working prototypes - has anyone else?
I thought the pebble bed reactor concept was interesting too. As I understood it tho, uranium is the limiting factor for a nuclear electricity economy. There's enough uranium for a while, but of we wanted to produce planetary scale amounts of nuclear electricity the struggle for uranium would relatively quickly mirror the current competition for oil. The proposed solution is a plutonium economy based on breeder reactors - and a plutonium economy has a lot of scary problems asscoiated with it. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
NO! Im not a female - but being a dragon, I do eat them.
|
Actually most plants have instituted their own storage vaults on-site that gets the fuel out of the pools into a dry storage cask
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|