|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
#23 |
Shut up brain, or I'll stab you with a Q-tip!
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 114
|
For the 24 hour period ending 4am EDT June 13 one of my domains had 461 hits with a referer from Secretcorner. Of the 461 hits 460 were from 8 unique IP addresses:
110 66.119.33.185 proxyche01.ia4.marketscore.com 41 66.119.33.186 proxyche02.ia4.marketscore.com 22 66.119.33.187 proxyche03.ia4.marketscore.com 58 66.119.33.188 proxyche04.ia4.marketscore.com 87 66.119.34.57 proxyche01.ia2.marketscore.com 63 66.119.34.58 proxyche02.ia2.marketscore.com 19 66.119.34.59 proxyche03.ia2.marketscore.com 60 66.119.34.60 proxyche04.ia2.marketscore.com Here is what a Google search says about Marketscore: http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&i...&q=marketscore Here is what Marketscore says about themselves: http://www.marketscore.com/e/faq.asp It doesn't look like any of the hits that came from Secretcorner ever went any further than just requesting my warning pages. The User-agent changes as I would expect if normal surfers are hitting my sites(example: "Mozilla/4.0 (comp atible; MSIE 5.5; Windows 98)") I have 43 other hits from addresses matching ^66.119.3 in my log and these appear to represent visits from 15 other tgp/linklists/search engines. I can think of a few possibilties to explain the Secretcorner hits- 1. Marketscore's caching engine could be periodically refreshing or pre-fetching cache, although if this were the case the User-Agent should be consistent. 2. Secretcorner could be buying or trading for traffic from a source that uses Marketscore's application to proxy a hitbot. 3. Secretcorner could be buying or trading for traffic that is actually generated on the client by Marketscore's application. In browsing around on Google I wasn't able to determine if Marketscore's client-side application actually runs as adware that redirects and generates traffic, or just logs surfing habits to resell as market research. I want to stress that I don't think any of this is necessarily indicative of any deception on the part of Secretcorner. Maybe I'm naive, but I can't think of any scenario where it would be to a linklist's advantage to purposefully send fake traffic to submitters. Wouldn't the money and effort would be better spent in other areas? |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|