|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#10 |
|
Aw, Dad, you've done a lot of great things, but you're a very old man, and old people are useless
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 22
|
Daryll, what confuses me a bit is your term "reseller".
Do you mean that a "reseller" is the paysite/webmaster who has an account with Verotel, and uses Verotel to bill his members OR is a "reseller" an affiliate of the above paysite? I have never, and will never use Verotel as my billing provider, but I have been suspended twice for "only" being an affiliate of a few Verotel sites, who in a period had slow sales and a few chargebacks. Secondly, off course I understand that you need a system to prevent dishonest account holders and even affiliates. But to punish the affiliate with a $30 fee?!? Give me a freaking break! Off course there should be no money to the paysite owner and no comisison to the affiliate on a chargeback , but why not just simply reverse the comission of that sales? Give me just one justifiable reason why you punish affiliates of your paysites a $30 fee on a chargeback? Like I said not only will I never, ever use Verotel for my 21 paysites, nor will I again become an affiliate of a paysite that use Verotel. How about some comments from current paysite owners. Do you think is fair that a billing company charges your affiliates a hefty $30 fee if one of your members do a chargeback? Or what about comments from other adult webmaster who sign up as affiliates of paysites. Do you think there $30 fee is fair? Last edited by RWF; 2004-12-09 at 01:14 PM.. |
|
|
|
|
|