Calling all honest linklist owners, I have something special for you.

Lizzie · 2005-03-09, 10:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Greenguy

You know, this entire thread could have been averted if you would have asked why the site(s) didn't get listed (like I ask people to do in the 1 email that I do send) instead of trying to influence a lot of Link List owners into changing their procedures to suit your needs.

I'm off to find the "dare" posts

No, this whole thing could have been avoided if those of you who don't send rejection e-mails would have stayed out of the thread

If you just could have tried not to get your high and mighty attitudes in here we would have submitted our sites to those that send e-mails, been rejected, fixed whatever needed to be fixed and re submitted them.

It is that simple.

Tommy · 2005-03-09, 10:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lizzie

No, this whole thing could have been avoided if those of you who don't send rejection e-mails would have stayed out of the thread

the title of this thread is
Calling all honest linklist owners, I have something special for you.
it says nothing about rejection emails

I noticed your boyfriend keeps saying this is his thread, and dare and me both jumped in it so we had a bashing coming

this is a public thread and he doesnt own this board and if you ask the owners of this board I am sure they will tell you we are welcome to post in any thread

Lizzie · 2005-03-09, 10:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tommy

the title of this thread is
Calling all honest linklist owners, I have something special for you.
it says nothing about rejection emails

I noticed your boyfriend keeps saying this is his thread, and dare and me both jumped in it so we had a bashing coming

this is a public thread and he doesnt own this board and if you ask the owners of this board I am sure they will tell you we are welcome to post in any thread

Your right about the title, but IF you READ the post, then there is absolutely NO REASON for you to post in the thread unless it is to start an piss match.

I never said that you weren't 'allowed' to post here. I simply said there was no need for any of you to respond if you weren't sending rejection e-mails.

And you know what, having honest site owners running your recip on pages that you wouldn't list and not telling them is dishonest .

Boyfriend?

Tommy · 2005-03-09, 10:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lizzie

And you know what, having honest site owners running your recip on pages that you wouln't list and not telling them is dishonest .

its not dishonest... its just not humanly possable
a copy and paste from my admin area

555 Accepted submissions in the last 24 hours (2374 rejected submissions)

how the hell am i supposed to send 2374 rejection emails in a day

its just not possable, these sites move thru thousands of submits and to do that you need speed, thats just the way the buisness is today

Lizzie · 2005-03-09, 10:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tommy

its not dishonest... its just not humanly possable
a copy and paste from my admin area

555 Accepted submissions in the last 24 hours (2374 rejected submissions)

how the hell am i supposed to send 2374 rejection emails in a day

its just not possable, these sites move thru thousands of submits and to do that you need speed, thats just the way the buisness is today

Hmmm, so there is no automated way to send e-mails? You have to do it manually? Wow....

Lemmy · 2005-03-09, 12:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tommy

how the hell am i supposed to send 2374 rejection emails in a day

I did the math: If you stay up 24/7 and send an e-mail every 36 seconds it shouldn't be a problem at all.

Tommy · 2005-03-09, 12:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lemmy

I did the math: If you stay up 24/7 and send an e-mail every 36 seconds it shouldn't be a problem at all.

then I would be a honest webmaster :-)

Greenguy · 2005-03-09, 11:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lizzie

No, this whole thing could have been avoided if those of you who don't send rejection e-mails would have stayed out of the thread

Like I said before:

Quote:

Originally Posted by Adult Traffic

...If you're willing to honestly look at my freesite when I submit it to you and if you don't like it but are willing to be honest & send me an e-mail even if it says "fuck off" then this is what I will do for you. I will do this regardless of your size of how much traffic you send.

I do not send rejections emails, therefore, by your analogy, I am not honest.

And you have to remember that this thread was started because of this thread.

Had this thread been started without the other thread & without the implication about honesty, none of these would be going on. AST worded his post wrong & now he has to defend it.

These 2 things are the main reason this thread has gone the way it has.

Lizzie · 2005-03-09, 11:43 AM

Like I said before:

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lizzie

No, this whole thing could have been avoided if those of you who don't send rejection e-mails would have stayed out of the thread

If you just could have tried not to get your high and mighty attitudes in here we would have submitted our sites to those that send e-mails, been rejected, fixed whatever needed to be fixed and re submitted them.

It is that simple.

You guys made this thread what it is