What would you rather have content or money?

Originally Posted by Mr. Blue

So a $15 revshare signup instead he would take $30 in content? Seems odd to me as if your site has a good retention and rebill rate he would make more than $30.

Also you supply free content to promote your site? So, when he goes through that content if he requested more content would you supply him with it? Most sponsors usually do...so if he just remained promoting your site he could build up a nice little revshare income (if you have a good rebill rate), and still have content supplied by you to promote your site.

Firstly an affiliate will have to build up a lot of joins to just wander into the site to take what he thinks he can. Then he will get it with our logo and must promote us, with the new 2257 US affiliates might be stuck with softcore only because I may not give out the IDs, that will be decided on an individaul basis.

So this content is hit to do what he likes with within the license terms.

SirMoby
Yes that is what we thought at first, but all the lawyers in all the US magazine companies are telling us otherwise. That would cripple the US teen porn market.

In fact it would damage the market in more than just teens.

[swedguy]

Originally Posted by Paul Markham2

Then he will get it with our logo and must promote us

Then it's not that a very good deal, IMHO. It's basically just sponsor content, nothing else.
Get paid with sponsor content or money? Easy choice.

Originally Posted by swedguy

Then it's not that a very good deal, IMHO. It's basically just sponsor content, nothing else.
Get paid with sponsor content or money? Easy choice.

No that would be the free content, the content in place of money would be the content store, content.

[swedguy]

Originally Posted by Paul Markham2

No that would be the free content, the content in place of money would be the content store, content.

But if the content can only be used for promoting your sites, it's just glorified sponsor content.