cogent bandwidth?

grand · 2003-11-05, 11:58 PM

it read many people saying that cogent bandwidth is shitty...what do you think?

WicKed · 2003-11-06, 03:30 AM

I have cogent, works fine for me.

teamperfectogab · 2003-11-06, 05:50 AM

hello

well cogent is supposed to be the 'cheap' one, i dont know the EXACT reasons why ppl said it's shitty, but from our hosting experience, i can say we never got it, and usually ISPs sell that one cheaper.

if you're looking for a good host, i reccommend Oxeo

have fun!

macho · 2003-11-06, 02:36 PM

never been good

SweetT · 2003-11-06, 05:46 PM

Maybe I can help a bit.....

Cogent has built a network designed to offer a low cost solution to companies that need bandwidth. They purchased a couple of providers early on to gain peering arrangements and transit arrangements so that they could provide connectivity to the world. Just remember their number one priority is cost.

With that said, however, the Cogent network has been pretty stable over the past couple of years. Very few outages. But using their system of "hot potato" routing, it is most cost effective to get your traffic off of their network as soon as possible, even if the carrier that they are handing it off to is not the best route available. In addition, their peering relationships are usually always strained. How many people remember when AOL pulled their peering from Cogent back about 6-8 months ago? There was a 3 day window when Cogent could not get *any* traffic to AOL and another 6 weeks where it was overloading thier Level3 peering point to an extreme and made it excruciatingly slow.....but the network never went down.

So....to sum it up....if you are looking for high quality, fast, and low latency hosting (ie paysites, reseller sites) I would stay away from Cogent. If the quality is not that important to you (ie Free Hosting, spam) then Cogent will probably do you just fine.

Hope this helps!

--T

xxxjay · 2003-11-09, 04:52 AM

they are ok

Kacy · 2003-11-11, 12:13 AM

Yea, what Tony said

If you run pay sites or anything mission critical, I would highly recommend going with network that has redundant high quality providers.

If you just need cheap and its for galleries, movies (static content) then cogent is about the cheapest you can get and it will get the job done.

We use both and each server a purpose. Just depends on your needs

2003-11-05, 11:58 PM	#1
grand Are you sure you're an accredited and honored pornographer? Join Date: Aug 2003 Posts: 64	cogent bandwidth? it read many people saying that cogent bandwidth is shitty...what do you think?

2003-11-06, 03:30 AM	#2
WicKed The only guys who wear Hawaiian shirts are gay guys and big fat party animals Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: Dirty South Posts: 176	I have cogent, works fine for me. __________________ <a href="http://www.wickedwebmasters.com/submit/">Hand Submit to 100's of TGPs</a><br> ICQ 178-247-277

2003-11-06, 05:50 AM	#3
teamperfectogab If something's hard to do, then it's not worth doing Join Date: Sep 2003 Posts: 246	cogent hello well cogent is supposed to be the 'cheap' one, i dont know the EXACT reasons why ppl said it's shitty, but from our hosting experience, i can say we never got it, and usually ISPs sell that one cheaper. if you're looking for a good host, i reccommend Oxeo have fun! __________________ Promote Our Newest Site: Ultimate Boot Fetish - gabrio @ perfectodollars.com

2003-11-06, 02:36 PM	#4
macho Aw, Dad, you've done a lot of great things, but you're a very old man, and old people are useless Join Date: Oct 2003 Posts: 20	never been good __________________ ICQ:248297702 AIM:sp1d3y2003 Email=sales@extremerack.com

2003-11-06, 05:46 PM	#5
SweetT Rock stars ... is there anything they don't know? Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: Atlanta, Georgia Posts: 10	Maybe I can help a bit..... Cogent has built a network designed to offer a low cost solution to companies that need bandwidth. They purchased a couple of providers early on to gain peering arrangements and transit arrangements so that they could provide connectivity to the world. Just remember their number one priority is cost. With that said, however, the Cogent network has been pretty stable over the past couple of years. Very few outages. But using their system of "hot potato" routing, it is most cost effective to get your traffic off of their network as soon as possible, even if the carrier that they are handing it off to is not the best route available. In addition, their peering relationships are usually always strained. How many people remember when AOL pulled their peering from Cogent back about 6-8 months ago? There was a 3 day window when Cogent could not get any traffic to AOL and another 6 weeks where it was overloading thier Level3 peering point to an extreme and made it excruciatingly slow.....but the network never went down. So....to sum it up....if you are looking for high quality, fast, and low latency hosting (ie paysites, reseller sites) I would stay away from Cogent. If the quality is not that important to you (ie Free Hosting, spam) then Cogent will probably do you just fine. Hope this helps! --T __________________ <a href="http://www.natnet.com/?r=sweetggj"><img src="http://www.natnet.com/sigpartners/bigfish.gif" width="468" height="80" border="0" alt="Sooner or Later, You'll Use NationalNet." /></a>

2003-11-09, 04:52 AM	#6
xxxjay You can now put whatever you want in this space :) Join Date: Apr 2003 Location: atlanta Posts: 1,787	they are ok __________________ Circle Of Violence

2003-11-11, 12:13 AM	#7
Kacy Rock stars ... is there anything they don't know? Join Date: Nov 2003 Location: So Cal Posts: 12	Yea, what Tony said If you run pay sites or anything mission critical, I would highly recommend going with network that has redundant high quality providers. If you just need cheap and its for galleries, movies (static content) then cogent is about the cheapest you can get and it will get the job done. We use both and each server a purpose. Just depends on your needs __________________ ~Kacy Get Naked With Me