Quote:
Originally Posted by ardentgent
Paul, is it your opinion that pictures not fitting the definition of sexually explicit as defined in 2257 are not covered by 2257? So if I make a gallery that does not meet the definition of sexually explicit, just nudity at "worse"I do not have to do anything regarding the statute- no exemption statement, nada?
|
That is my understanding of the law. However a grey area is what the rest of the set contianed and I must get over and read that bit again to see what it says.
Quote:
Paul, the problem is if they use softcore content to promote a hardcore site with hardcore banners, then their publication contains one or more images of sexual content and then they need 2257 for everything in the publication.
There is little or no way to slip out of this one easily.
|
Not if you don't use their banner.
A lot of free porn just went soft.