Greenguy's Board


Go Back   Greenguy's Board > General Business Knowledge
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rating: Thread Rating: 4 votes, 4.00 average. Display Modes
Old 2005-06-13, 02:11 AM   #1
porndragon
Trying is the first step towards failure
 
porndragon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 129
So do you guys think 2257 could mean the end to free content? Not alot of sites going to hand out model info to every wacko with an adult site...
__________________

Dave's Porn Links
porndragon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2005-06-13, 09:27 AM   #2
Useless
Certified Nice Person
 
Useless's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Dirty Undies, NY
Posts: 11,268
Send a message via ICQ to Useless
Quote:
Originally Posted by porndragon
So do you guys think 2257 could mean the end to free content? Not alot of sites going to hand out model info to every wacko with an adult site...
No, absolutely not. The IDs are only necessary for hardcore content (which makes no sense what so ever) and only for US webmasters. You'll just see a lot of American webmasters switching to softcore or getting out of adult. I never liked Americans anyway.

Oh wait...
__________________
Click here to purchase a bridge I'm selling.
Useless is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2005-06-13, 09:28 AM   #3
mrMagoo
Just because I don't care doesn't mean I don't understand!
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Chicago
Posts: 96
Send a message via Yahoo to mrMagoo
Quote:
Originally Posted by porndragon
So do you guys think 2257 could mean the end to free content? Not alot of sites going to hand out model info to every wacko with an adult site...
I think this is already begining to happen. Although not every sponsor has made their position clear yet.

I think there is going to be alot of gnawing of fingers and gnashing of teeth by alot of people over this until the DOJ looses in court, as it has already in the 10th circuit, owing to it's invalid implementation of the statute.

As far as I know, the offending clause at § 75.1(c)(4)(iii), 'other than those activities identified in paragraphs (c)(1) and (2) of this section' is already and currently stricken in the 10th circuit. If I lived in that circuit I would ask my lawyer.
mrMagoo is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:38 AM.


Mark Read
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© Greenguy Marketing Inc