|
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
#1 |
HEY NOW!
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: in the Matrix Glitching on an Endless Loop. Loop. Loop. Loop. Loo
Posts: 1,218
|
anybody who has ever gotten a surfer e-mail begging for info on a specific model knows what you are saying... some people get ruthless just thru e-mail... but i've said it before and i'll say it again... porn actors/actresses are the equivalent of dirt to the religious right wing that is pushing all of the anti-obscene bullshit, they are sinners and should all roast in hell
__________________
don't mind me im nothing but nonsense <3 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Never thought a lot of you Boogie, until now.
RESPECT. ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
I like to blog :)
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,050
|
Quote:
![]() to hear it from a respected content producer like yourself means a lot. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
If there was more people prepared to stand up we would not have our backs to the wall. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Arghhhh...submit yer sites ya ruddy swabs!
|
Looks like perhaps things are heading in the right direction...
http://www.greenguysboard.com/board/...ad.php?t=20955 Saw a post on another board...thought this was the perfect place to mention it on this board... IF someone DOES get dragged in...putting together a defense fund should help. I'd definitely contribute! Frankly, that's my biggest concern about this crap. I have no doubt it will be tossed out of court if anyone is busted. BUT, financially something like this could break an individual pretty fuckin quick. IF we as a community contributed til it hurt...if need be...we'd make a much more formidable foe in court. Especially if the ACLU gets involved...this 'should' be a slam dunk! Hell, if that wasn't a concern...I'd be right there beside ya Boogie. For that matter...if more folks agree to a defense fund...I am! LOL! I'd even leave all several hundred of my free sites live and intact. Be happy to provide links to any owners who don't already have em...get more exposure to the sites don't yanno ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Ahhh ... sweet pity. Where would my love life be without it?
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: British Columbia, Canada
Posts: 208
|
Sounds to me like the US industry will slowly move out of the US. The small, medium and big webmasters in Canada and Europe will benefit. Demand for online porn will never diminish but fewer Americans will be supplying it. US webmasters with the resources and willingness to do so, will likely move to Canada where they can continue to run their buisness as if nothing happened.
Sorry guys but I think the USA is in an overall sad state with the Bush administration and the power he lends to the christian right. Not to mention its forien policy and protectionist trade policies. How will america react to the fact that it will soon no longer be the worlds economic superpower. Lookout here comes China. but i digress from 2257 discussions
__________________
<a href="http://www.fioramall.com/click/sponsor.php?kw_userid=Stever"><img src="http://www.steverslinks.com/images/fiora.gif"</a> |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Arghhhh...submit yer sites ya ruddy swabs!
|
Boogie...give em hell! Seriously man, very well said...props
![]() RawAlex...sad to fuckin say it...really is...that this shit could actually happen in 2005...but you're right on all counts ![]() That's exactly what this is about...cleansing the net of the filthy pornographers. When the hell did sex become a bad thing? When did sexual pleasure become obscene? The religious right has got to be put in check. What IS obscene is that this is even an issue. The seperation of church and state needs some reminding... I still don't see this standing...but does look like thar's gonna be a rumble ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
If there is nobody out there, that's a lot of real estate going to waste!
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,177
|
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Arghhhh...submit yer sites ya ruddy swabs!
|
Arghhh...can't sleep...
What suprises me more than anything about this is how many major programs made massive changes instead of fighting. One would think that these companies should have the financial resources to fight this out. So what happens when the injunctions are granted? Or, a prosecution is thrown out of court? Back to biz as usual? Or, are the programs going to leave their new systems in place? IF the DOJ really wants to look up a model ID, I implemented something on my new sites that launched this morning. http://www.real-girls.biz/2257/061305/1/ Paul, you'll be glad to notice it's your content ![]() I've provided the specific set ID information AND the original custodian of records. If an investigating agency needs to see the model info...grab a warrant and trot your ass on over to the original producer. The individual who saw the model...saw the ID's and produced the images. Ok...back to bed... |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | ||
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
Eventually got his address and got his door knocked on by a friend. Scared the shit out of him. ![]() Quote:
![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
Certified Nice Person
|
![]() I have, as of yet, not pulled a single pic because I'm hoping that the sponsors who have demanded the removal of certain content come to their senses before it's too late. If it wasn't for them, I wouldn't be pulling a damned thing. Everyone has different threshholds for risk. Mine is very high, but then again, I have nothing to lose. And don't anyone come here telling me that I could go to jail. Bullshit, bullshit, bullshit.
__________________
Click here to purchase a bridge I'm selling. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 | |
You can now put whatever you want in this space :)
|
Quote:
---art |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 | |
If there is nobody out there, that's a lot of real estate going to waste!
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,177
|
Quote:
One used to be in the nasty section of the special forces, and setting next to him in a restaurant while he teases the local SWAT team from the cop shop across the street can be nerve racking. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|