2257 arguments

Linkster · 2005-06-24, 04:14 PM

Tommy - you bring up a point that I havent seen posted anywhere - back in May this year the DOJ did something else that no one seems to care about - they formed a new task force called the OBSCENITY PROSECUTION TASK FORCE
and I havent heard word one on any board about any of the things they say they are going after - and I guarantee that they are looking to get into a lot more than this 2257 stuff

Talk about making myself a shit-stirrer LOL

http://www.usdoj.gov/opa/pr/2005/May/05_crm_242.htm

Wenchy · 2005-06-24, 06:27 PM

I noticed that the other day reading through the whining crybaby diatribe that was the DOJ attorneys' "rebuttal" to the FSC filing... I remember thinking it was important at the time, but by the time I finished wading through all the self-serving, totally-avoiding-the-point bullshit, my brain had turned to mush and I completely forgot about it... until you mentioned it, Linkster.

I sure would like to know what's going on in THOSE meetings... or maybe I wouldn't |shocking|

mrMagoo · 2005-06-27, 10:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Linkster

Tommy - you bring up a point that I havent seen posted anywhere - back in May this year the DOJ did something else that no one seems to care about - they formed a new task force called the OBSCENITY PROSECUTION TASK FORCE
and I havent heard word one on any board about any of the things they say they are going after - and I guarantee that they are looking to get into a lot more than this 2257 stuff

Talk about making myself a shit-stirrer LOL

http://www.usdoj.gov/opa/pr/2005/May/05_crm_242.htm

I think (very dangerous) but I'm not sure that the obscenity cases have been held up by the extreme associate case.

I heard the DOJ was going to appeal but haven't heard anything new.

Here is a link to an article:
http://www.peak.org/mailing-list/arc.../msg05988.html

Dravyk · 2005-06-28, 07:59 AM

I'd thought up a dozen different things wrong with 2257 that should get the sucker overturned ...

But I have to admit, you've come up a beauty, Tommy! And one I'd not seen elsewhere.

Good to see the Old School brains are still working.

2005-06-24, 04:14 PM	#1
Linkster NO! Im not a female - but being a dragon, I do eat them. Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Sex Delta Posts: 5,084	Tommy - you bring up a point that I havent seen posted anywhere - back in May this year the DOJ did something else that no one seems to care about - they formed a new task force called the OBSCENITY PROSECUTION TASK FORCE and I havent heard word one on any board about any of the things they say they are going after - and I guarantee that they are looking to get into a lot more than this 2257 stuff Talk about making myself a shit-stirrer LOL http://www.usdoj.gov/opa/pr/2005/May/05_crm_242.htm __________________ Pussy Chompers Porn Links NSCash

2005-06-24, 06:27 PM	#2
Wenchy Trying is the first step towards failure Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: Mile High City Posts: 120	I noticed that the other day reading through the whining crybaby diatribe that was the DOJ attorneys' "rebuttal" to the FSC filing... I remember thinking it was important at the time, but by the time I finished wading through all the self-serving, totally-avoiding-the-point bullshit, my brain had turned to mush and I completely forgot about it... until you mentioned it, Linkster. I sure would like to know what's going on in THOSE meetings... or maybe I wouldn't \|shocking\| __________________ I was thinking of the immortal words of Socrates, who said, "I drank what?"

2005-06-28, 07:59 AM	#4
Dravyk Lord help me, I'm just not that bright Join Date: Apr 2003 Posts: 102	I'd thought up a dozen different things wrong with 2257 that should get the sucker overturned ... But I have to admit, you've come up a beauty, Tommy! And one I'd not seen elsewhere. Good to see the Old School brains are still working. __________________ WebmasterConventions.com Mainstream Webmasters