Is the DoJ going to bust the search engines - Page 2

Linkster · 2005-06-25, 02:19 PM

SirMoby - I happen to agree with that - especially if the WM only uses partner submits and never reviews the galleries and requires the submitter to make the thumbs - a good disclaimer at the bottom of the page that you are not responsible for the contents would help as well

WannaShagg · 2005-06-25, 03:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by artwilliams

No, the DOJ are going to go after those terrible porn peddlers who run the cable companies and tv stations! Let's make sure every cable, VHS and UHF station manager have their docs ready for the feds!

---art

Exactly, and what about all the little shady motels that show movies, or even the porno store. Then make all them have the models id's too.

WannaShagg · 2005-06-25, 03:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by babymaker

yahoo still has the adult groups up i have 3

they host 'em

and they are adult sites, so either they think 2257 is BS or have a special deal like the FSC lol i don't know

I did something yesterday that was shoking. I approved every fucking link submitted to my tgp withour looking at it. I didn't even delete the ones with all caps. I didn't even delete the ones from spammers that I normally would never list. I appoved intil I couldn't click anymore. I listed them with text descriptions. What the webmaster has on their servers is their business. They are trying to cut down on the circulation of porn, so to prevent this I published any fucking they sent me.

Vink · 2005-06-25, 04:49 PM

If the DOJ goes after someone I hope that person is attractive and charming because that person is going to hit the talk show curcuit hard. Everyone would want this person on their show. It's titallating. Television and radio. A sure fire way to get on the Howard Stern show.
That's why I don't believe the whole "won't hit people with deep pockets" thing. Anyone that gets hit with this is going to have deep pockets. I'm already counting Sean Penn and Tim Robbins' contributions to the legal fund.

tickler · 2005-06-25, 07:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WannaShagg

Exactly, and what about all the little shady motels that show movies, or even the porno store. Then make all them have the models id's too.

That reminded me of some strip clubs that have porn running on TVs all over the bar.

ngb1959 · 2005-06-26, 05:38 AM

This has nothing to do with search engines, but are they going to change Girls Gone Wild to Girls Gone Mild ???

2005-06-25, 02:19 PM	#26
Linkster NO! Im not a female - but being a dragon, I do eat them. Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Sex Delta Posts: 5,084	SirMoby - I happen to agree with that - especially if the WM only uses partner submits and never reviews the galleries and requires the submitter to make the thumbs - a good disclaimer at the bottom of the page that you are not responsible for the contents would help as well __________________ Pussy Chompers Porn Links NSCash

2005-06-26, 05:38 AM	#31
ngb1959 Oh no, I'm sweating like Roger Ebert Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: In A Box, A Big Old Box Posts: 501	This has nothing to do with search engines, but are they going to change Girls Gone Wild to Girls Gone Mild ??? __________________ Ubuymenow Internet Shopping Dreamypleasures Free Porn

2005-06-25, 04:49 PM	#29
Vink Trying is the first step towards failure Join Date: Sep 2004 Location: Van Nuys CA Posts: 124	If the DOJ goes after someone I hope that person is attractive and charming because that person is going to hit the talk show curcuit hard. Everyone would want this person on their show. It's titallating. Television and radio. A sure fire way to get on the Howard Stern show. That's why I don't believe the whole "won't hit people with deep pockets" thing. Anyone that gets hit with this is going to have deep pockets. I'm already counting Sean Penn and Tim Robbins' contributions to the legal fund.