OK, I need to know...

[Jim]

I truly believe that the DOJ, if they go after anyone will be child pornographers. And rightly so... They claim that is what this law is for.

[WannaShagg]

Originally Posted by Jim

I truly believe that the DOJ, if they go after anyone will be child pornographers. And rightly so... They claim that is what this law is for.

True, unless you have a pic of a model that is just not right, or some chick complained about having her pic on the net without it being licensed at all, then why should they bother you. All the sponsors and content providers has the release. So any ligitimate model knows her pics are there and tough. Just suppose the sponsors or content providers don't have the proper license to distribute the girls pics. Maybe that is why some sponsors and content people are folding, they know their shit isn't sqaure to begin with. Maybe now would be a good time to follow up on "Acacia". Whatever happened with that?

[Useless]

Originally Posted by Jim

I truly believe that the DOJ, if they go after anyone will be child pornographers. And rightly so... They claim that is what this law is for.

I was discussing this with the wife, since she is just slightly more sensible than me, and you know what came up? Al Capone. Yes, Al Capone. If the government was forced to jail a notorious gangster, bootlegger, and murderer for income tax evasion/fraud, then how unlikely is it that they would go after an otherwise untouchable child pornographer by nabbing him/her on improper record keeping? You'd think they must have someone in mind and I seriously doubt that it's a lowly webmaster.

I fear 2257 prosecution the way I fear NY's law against driving while on a cell phone. No one gets pulled over for that and it's pretty blatantly ignored. Of course, I don't own a cell phone.

[Jim]

Originally Posted by Useless Warrior

I was discussing this with the wife, since she is just slightly more sensible than me, and you know what came up? Al Capone. Yes, Al Capone. If the government was forced to jail a notorious gangster, bootlegger, and murderer for income tax evasion/fraud, then how unlikely is it that they would go after an otherwise untouchable child pornographer by nabbing him/her on improper record keeping? You'd think they must have someone in mind and I seriously doubt that it's a lowly webmaster.

I fear 2257 prosecution the way I fear NY's law against driving while on a cell phone. No one gets pulled over for that and it's pretty blatantly ignored. Of course, I don't own a cell phone.

Exactly useless...
They will not come after us. They will go after those that deserve it if they go after anyone at all. The last thing they want is for their test case to be thrown out.