|
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
#1 |
NO! Im not a female - but being a dragon, I do eat them.
|
neveremail - I havent seen a difference whether I develop the domain the day I buy it or if I wait - it works exactly the same and has for years as Bill stated
Bill - as far as language in the patent - Ill look around to see if I can find any and get back As far as Jil - that kind of "garbage writing" is meant for the masses - I could have said the same by saying that Google uses all kinds of algorithmic tactics on a newly purchased domain that makes it difficult for someone that wants to spam with a domain and makes them wait a while ![]() My opinion as I stated before is that there is no delay with a fresh domain - with a previously owned domain there are some hurdles to overcome to make sure that you arent going to try to benefit from a domains previous attributes. Which again has been around since the "DMOZ expired" buying craze and was a defensive move that Google saw a need for - otherwise a domain takes just as long to get in and rank as it always has. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
NO! Im not a female - but being a dragon, I do eat them.
|
Bill - after muddling through the first parts of the patent it sounds very much like a system I think they have been using for a long time - it basically takes the average growth of a site and looks at how fast a newly found domain grows, how often the pages really change, how often womeone searching for that specific info chooses an old doc versus a new one, etc etc.
![]() Basically I think they are just writing up some of the averaging factors they have buit in to the algo over the last few years based on their link tracking theyve been doing and bringing in some of the preventative measures theyve added to control script generated sites - but I sure dont see anything that would lead me to a sandbox let alone a playground like some of these people have in their minds ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|