SE Spammer Revealed

Rorschach · 2005-07-03, 06:36 PM

So can someone tell me why you don't think that sponsors should not accept perfectly legal traffic? For example, with the filehandler.biz guy's stuff - no laws are being broken, no mainstream surfers are being forced to look at porn, there's no blog/ wiki/ ref spamming, about the only thing he's guilty of is adding some hidden links to the bottom of the pages on his own site and using a content delivery method that the SEs themselves use. The guy isn't filling up the internet with hardcore free porn for minors to look at (except for the single hosted galleries to which he sends some of his traffic). In my view this is certainly no worse than expired domain traffic (with which a far greater proportion of mainstream surfers get sucked into looking at porn) and no one ever bitches about that.

Oh sorry, I forgot, he's "cheating honest webmasters."

SPAM = Site Positioned Above Mine

2005-07-03, 06:36 PM	#16
Rorschach Shut up brain, or I'll stab you with a Q-tip! Join Date: Nov 2003 Posts: 115	So can someone tell me why you don't think that sponsors should not accept perfectly legal traffic? For example, with the filehandler.biz guy's stuff - no laws are being broken, no mainstream surfers are being forced to look at porn, there's no blog/ wiki/ ref spamming, about the only thing he's guilty of is adding some hidden links to the bottom of the pages on his own site and using a content delivery method that the SEs themselves use. The guy isn't filling up the internet with hardcore free porn for minors to look at (except for the single hosted galleries to which he sends some of his traffic). In my view this is certainly no worse than expired domain traffic (with which a far greater proportion of mainstream surfers get sucked into looking at porn) and no one ever bitches about that. Oh sorry, I forgot, he's "cheating honest webmasters." SPAM = Site Positioned Above Mine