I know you don't like autosubmitters...

Fido · 2005-07-04, 03:18 PM

Yes, these are problems. And what about some kind of autofiller? Something that would load the form page, fill it, but webmaster still sees the whole form and manually presses the submit button. What about this? Would you approve it on your LL?

Linkster · 2005-07-04, 03:37 PM

First off - there are about 10 autosubmitter programs out there specifically made for submitting to LLs - so they already exist - as well as many autoformfillers - they already exist as well.
Most sell for around $30 and some as high as $90 with some that provide updates to the database for a monthly charge etc.

The problems I've seen - the first being the problem that was brought up about not seeing the rules - or for that matter the advertising I want you to see when you visit my WMs page - thats part of the whole package of submitting is that there will be a certain percentage of WMs that might sign up under me for some programs I think are really good.

Second - most of the programs that "update their databases" - DONT - they still have recips in their for old cats and dont have recips for new cats.

Third - most autosubmitters dont ever take the time to check their submissions - of even learn how to use the program - which causes extra work for us LL owners cleaning up our databases of hundreds of failed attempts.

Fourth - We decided on a rule that said no autosubmitters, and requested that a lot of our LLs be removed from the autosubmitters - which hasnt happened - which means when the submits come to our LLs the submitter gets banned automatically - no questions asked.

Last - there is nothing wrong with using an auto-form-filler - as long as it doesnt cache or pull in a copy of the submit form - again, this is something that bypasses the submit page (refer back to the other reasons).
If used correctly and just for doing copying faster - formfillers are a great tool.

And lastly - you will hear this over and over - if you dont have time to copy and paste five lines of text to get free traffic - then the LLs will tell you they dont have time to review your site - which takes longer than your submitting. So we have many ways that dont get shared with the gen publ to detect and ban autosubmitters

2005-07-04, 03:37 PM	#2
Linkster NO! Im not a female - but being a dragon, I do eat them. Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Sex Delta Posts: 5,084	First off - there are about 10 autosubmitter programs out there specifically made for submitting to LLs - so they already exist - as well as many autoformfillers - they already exist as well. Most sell for around $30 and some as high as $90 with some that provide updates to the database for a monthly charge etc. The problems I've seen - the first being the problem that was brought up about not seeing the rules - or for that matter the advertising I want you to see when you visit my WMs page - thats part of the whole package of submitting is that there will be a certain percentage of WMs that might sign up under me for some programs I think are really good. Second - most of the programs that "update their databases" - DONT - they still have recips in their for old cats and dont have recips for new cats. Third - most autosubmitters dont ever take the time to check their submissions - of even learn how to use the program - which causes extra work for us LL owners cleaning up our databases of hundreds of failed attempts. Fourth - We decided on a rule that said no autosubmitters, and requested that a lot of our LLs be removed from the autosubmitters - which hasnt happened - which means when the submits come to our LLs the submitter gets banned automatically - no questions asked. Last - there is nothing wrong with using an auto-form-filler - as long as it doesnt cache or pull in a copy of the submit form - again, this is something that bypasses the submit page (refer back to the other reasons). If used correctly and just for doing copying faster - formfillers are a great tool. And lastly - you will hear this over and over - if you dont have time to copy and paste five lines of text to get free traffic - then the LLs will tell you they dont have time to review your site - which takes longer than your submitting. So we have many ways that dont get shared with the gen publ to detect and ban autosubmitters __________________ Pussy Chompers Porn Links NSCash

2005-07-04, 03:18 PM	#1
Fido And Lord, we are especially thankful for nuclear power, the cleanest, safest energy source there is. Except for solar, which is just a pipe dream Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: Czech Republic Posts: 229	Yes, these are problems. And what about some kind of autofiller? Something that would load the form page, fill it, but webmaster still sees the whole form and manually presses the submit button. What about this? Would you approve it on your LL?