|
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
#1 |
Registered User
|
Mpeg1 is surly the way to go for compatibilty, with a small video like that, most can double size it ok with some loss to the quality, But with video that small you might even be able to squeze a little less on the bit rat if you are concerned about BW. I would not go lower then 350 to 400. But still should come down really nicly. I have seen camshows stream at 200 on WM9 and look like tv quality but thats a whole other animal.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
No offence Apu, but when they were handing out religions you must have been out taking a whizz
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Seattle
Posts: 281
|
Thanks for all the input!
I don't really want to do two formats, because unless I'm mistaken, doesn't MPEG work for everyone? It seems to be the obvious choice for saving on server space and saving time when it comes to paying someone to do the work. I've added the question for my members to my message board, and so far, they're all chiming in to say that MPEG works for them. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
If you don’t take a chance the Angels won’t dance
|
Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Oh! I haven't changed since high school and suddenly I am uncool
|
I use MPEG1 with 750 and everyone seems happy with it. I have tried every format out there...MOV, AVI, RM, etc. and the best by far is the MPEG1. Everything else stirs up complaints that they can't view them.
![]()
__________________
The Woman with a Surprise |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|