Index doorway trick (or some magic :)

[SortLinks]

Sean.... I wont argue with you..Do it if you wish..
But these LLs have rules and its easy to follow em
Upon my experience ... artwilliams is right.
Just try
site1/folder1
site1/folder2
site1/folder3
you will be surprised getting accepted much faster and more often
Dont be surprised if your cached pages will lose PR very soon as well as index. (see below)

BTW the second page does not seem to be cached for me already
Besides..Your recip "More Porn For Me!" on these pages reminds me sortlinks'...AND I dont think it is a coincidence ))

What do you say?

[Sean416]

Originally Posted by SortLinks

Sean.... I wont argue with you..Do it if you wish..

I'm not arguing with anyone, take it easy. I dont submit freesites anymore. I'm just offering my opinoin on things so submitters to my LL know that I dont care about this.

Originally Posted by SortLinks

But these LLs have rules and its easy to follow em
Upon my experience ... artwilliams is right.
Just try
site1/folder1
site1/folder2
site1/folder3
you will be surprised getting accepted much faster and more often
Dont be surprised if your cached pages will lose PR very soon as well as index. (see below)

No, because most larger LLs don't allow you to go back in folders or switch folders. They want the entire site in one folder. The only viable option to get listed on most LLs would be to make completely different pages and just link to the images in the root freesite folder. But that would be heavy dupe content and thus not worth it to submit to smaller LLs at all. More people will just end up submitting to the biggest 15 or whatever LLs. So your rule rule, IMO, is alienating you. That's why I decided to make my post.

Originally Posted by SortLinks

Besides..Your recip "More Porn For Me!" on these pages reminds me sortlinks'...AND I dont think it is a coincidence ))

What do you say?

I made those recips in april of 2004. I hadnt even heard of SortLinks so don't flatter yourself. My new recips were made in February 2005 when I completely redesigned my site.

[Bill]

I think it's time to move to allowing more recips on a submitted free site.

I've been thinking about this for a while. Making many multiple doorways with 9 recips each hurts everyone in the long run.

I'd be willing to sacrifice the third sales link on the index page in exchange for the effectiveness of having, for example, 24 text recips on that page.

Linklists should benefit from the arrangement, because it will increase the variety of potential _new_ surfers and length of time that their recips might attract a few _new_ surfers to their list.

It should be better for gaining search engine traffic for both the linklists and the freesite builders.

[SortLinks]

Originally Posted by Sean416

No, because most larger LLs don't allow you to go back in folders or switch folders. They want the entire site in one folder. The only viable option to get listed on most LLs would be to make completely different pages and just link to the images in the root freesite folder. But that would be heavy dupe content and thus not worth it to submit to smaller LLs at all. More people will just end up submitting to the biggest 15 or whatever LLs. So your rule rule, IMO, is alienating you. That's why I decided to make my post.

who for example?
I dont know any...
I d rather say that many reject warning.html
I see that you dont submit sites

Originally Posted by Sean416

I made those recips in april of 2004. I hadnt even heard of SortLinks so don't flatter yourself. My new recips were made in February 2005 when I completely redesigned my site.

I ve made em earlier...besides color scheme and <div align center> instead of just <td align=center>
made me think so.
ok. nevermind.