|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Took the hint.
|
Actually, let me correct Surfn here: Cheaters and honest people both want to know. Cheaters will profit from that information much more than honest people would.
Again, it comes to numbers: If I can get rid of 100 cheaters and as a result also decline 1 honest webmasters, I cannot and will not change policies for that 1 person in order to create 100 more problems for myself. I also will not provide information that will allow those 100 cheaters to circumvent policies put in place to stop them from fucking my surfers over and wasting my time. I will also say this: The list of "banned hosts" is fluid. If I said "goodhost.com" is not banned, and that I will list everyone there, then all the cheaters will move over there tomorrow and I will be fucked again. If I get fucked too often, then I will have to charge to review sites, because the time required to handle it would be too high. Alex |
|
|
|
|
|