Bizarre site of the day

[furrygirl]

Originally Posted by GonZo

I dont know if it will help but I have found thier customer support to be excellent and as many people have said in other threads... CCBill has never been late on one payment.

Oh, don't get me wrong, I'm very happy with CCBill as a processor, which is why I've been with them for the 2 years since PSW took my money and ran. I just don't like their anti-red policy, and I think they are painfully obtuse when it comes to using their bots to determine whether or not something is onjectionable or not. Context is everything. You could have a link that says "Don't email me for a link trade if you're a filthy fucking pedophile, I'll turn you over to the police", and they'll say you have pedo content on your site and they're going to pull your billing.

It took both Trixie and I a number of emails to clarify the contexts of what we link to with CCBill, but they did come around. Now, if only they would decide that twat goo is no less freaky than cock goo.

[GonZo]

Originally Posted by furrygirl

Now, if only they would decide that twat goo is no less freaky than cock goo.

It all washes off.

[Toby]

Originally Posted by furrygirl

... I think they are painfully obtuse when it comes to using their bots to determine whether or not something is onjectionable or not. ...

I'm sure that CCbill would love to be able to have a knowledgable human personally review every web site, but that just isn't practical. It would involve a substantial labor cost, which would get passed along as higher processing fees for everyone. You may be willing to pay those higher fees for such service, but I doubt many others agree.

[Trixie]

Originally Posted by Toby

I'm sure that CCbill would love to be able to have a knowledgable human personally review every web site, but that just isn't practical. It would involve a substantial labor cost, which would get passed along as higher processing fees for everyone. You may be willing to pay those higher fees for such service, but I doubt many others agree.

I totally agree with you; the problem that arises is when they send out an email saying you've linked to a forbidden site (totally understandable for things to be automated up to this point), and you email them back explaining the context, and the rep responding can't figure out that the site shouldn't be blacklisted or is afraid to make that kind of a judgement call or even to ask a supervisor's opinion before hammering out responses on how they absolutely positively refuse to look at context and context doesn't matter one whit. It shouldn't be THAT hard to figure out that Scarleteen or Margaret Cho's blog (as two examples) are not porn sites, not peddling obscene content, etc.