Rant about NATs' Sponsors

gobgook2 · 2005-12-09, 12:04 PM

I've said this before - The person/company the comes out with something that combines the flexibility, cascading, and tracking power of NATS with the timely and combined payouts of CCBill will make a killing. That's my biggest gripe (sorry, nothing about encoded urls, etc). Internal payouts almost required a shift to higher payout levels, which smaller fish (like me) may take ages to reach, especially when testing new sponsors... I guess I'm just spoiled by CCBill's combining sales and timely payouts. Imagine if NATS were partnered with a company to do all payouts; instead of having to make $100 PER SPONSOR to get a payout, all sales from all sponsors counted together a la CCBill, and you KNEW you'd be getting a check every week instead of wondering whether or not a sponsor who pays out internally has their shit together, struggling with some sponsors to hit a high payout level, etc. Pipe dream perhaps, but somebody should get on that and make some bank!

Chop Smith · 2005-12-09, 02:08 PM

Hello, Mr Smith

Quote:

Originally Posted by gobgook2

...Pipe dream perhaps, but somebody should get on that and make some bank!

Maybe not. I snoop around from time to time trying to uncover secrets.

I think there is a script out there that meets most of the things on your wish list. Hoping it is released to the masses soon.

Let me pull a DD here. The above is nothing more than a Chop speculation.

raymor · 2005-12-16, 06:51 AM

If NATS annoys you, take heart, NATS may not be used by very many people
much longer. There's a new system about to be unvieled that's objectively
proven to be better than NATS in many ways and costs a LOT less.
The NATS folks stole code from the wrong people and rather than hiring
lawyers to go after NATS legally they hired programmers to go after NATS
business - very good programmers. NATS' days are numbered.

Useless · 2005-12-16, 09:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by raymor

...rather than hiring
lawyers to go after NATS legally they hired programmers to go after NATS
business...

I would have gone after their wives.

2005-12-16, 06:51 AM	#3
raymor The only guys who wear Hawaiian shirts are gay guys and big fat party animals Join Date: Jan 2004 Posts: 178	If NATS annoys you, take heart, NATS may not be used by very many people much longer. There's a new system about to be unvieled that's objectively proven to be better than NATS in many ways and costs a LOT less. The NATS folks stole code from the wrong people and rather than hiring lawyers to go after NATS legally they hired programmers to go after NATS business - very good programmers. NATS' days are numbered. __________________ Ray Morris support@bettercgi.com Strongbox/Throttlebox & more TXDPS #A14012

2005-12-09, 12:04 PM	#1
gobgook2 Are you sure you're an accredited and honored pornographer? Join Date: Oct 2005 Posts: 62	I've said this before - The person/company the comes out with something that combines the flexibility, cascading, and tracking power of NATS with the timely and combined payouts of CCBill will make a killing. That's my biggest gripe (sorry, nothing about encoded urls, etc). Internal payouts almost required a shift to higher payout levels, which smaller fish (like me) may take ages to reach, especially when testing new sponsors... I guess I'm just spoiled by CCBill's combining sales and timely payouts. Imagine if NATS were partnered with a company to do all payouts; instead of having to make $100 PER SPONSOR to get a payout, all sales from all sponsors counted together a la CCBill, and you KNEW you'd be getting a check every week instead of wondering whether or not a sponsor who pays out internally has their shit together, struggling with some sponsors to hit a high payout level, etc. Pipe dream perhaps, but somebody should get on that and make some bank!