|
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
#1 |
NO! Im not a female - but being a dragon, I do eat them.
|
In answer to the question about LLs that cheat and how to find them - there is a small issue in that while most will blacklist a LL for stealing/copying somebodies LL recips (like has happened in the past for Hoes and Cleos and a few others) there are link list owners out there that dont care about that and will continue to list free sites using those stolen recips or other copyright infringements etc.
I dont pretend to be the Link List cop and making a central database would just be asking for trouble in my opinion as out of the hundreds of link lists out there that would use it - I can guarantee based on posts Ive seen here that there are link lists owners that would list anything as long as it has a recip to their site and has 4 pages ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
There's Xanax in my thurible!
|
Quote:
I remember someone copying Cleo's recips and if I noticed that I probably would have mentioned something to the submitter. I guess my point is, some LL owners -- like myself -- are just as clueless about which LL's are considered cheaters. I appreciate the lists You and Useless put down below and I'll try to keep a better eye out for those sites. So it may not be that we don't care, but that we are just not informed. ![]() BTW: I know fuckthensuck used to be in my recip tables, I had no idea... -Preacher |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
NO! Im not a female - but being a dragon, I do eat them.
|
Mr Blue - basically in answer to your question about just tossing the free sites - since I work only with partner submitters - I do (and did in this case) send an email to the submitter to let them know for each and every case
![]() I think that it would be tough to say - here's a list - because again a lot of LL owners dont consider copying somebodies recips a "cheating infraction" or they simply dont care as evidenced by their continual listings of sites that do have those recips - and yes these would be LL owners that do know about the occurences and even posted in the threads way back |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | ||
Searching for Jimmy Hoffa
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 771
|
Quote:
![]() Quote:
I don't know, it just seems like a new LinkList is popping up daily now. It's getting hard to keep track of the players. |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
"Without evil there can be no good, so it must be good to be evil sometimes" ~ Satan
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Motor City, baby, where carjacking was invented! Now GIMME THOSE SHOES!
Posts: 2,385
|
Quote:
![]() Theiving motherfuckers who can't be bothered to design their own recips should be taken out and buried in a pit of scarabs. Link list owners that multisubmit (like fuckthensuck.com) are just fucking uncivilized. Last edited by MadMax; 2005-12-23 at 09:14 PM.. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Arghhhh...submit yer sites ya ruddy swabs!
|
Quote:
![]() With a minor addition...add a fire ant mound in with the scarabs ![]() Running a link site is definitely not for the feint of heart or those looking for a quick buck. It's more of a long LONG term love/hate kinda thang...lol. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Searching for Jimmy Hoffa
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 771
|
lol, I run TGP's and it's pretty much the same mentality. I mean there's 4000 or so TGPs out there and around 40 that actually update and send decent traffic daily.
When I started submitting freesites again I used the quality over quantity equation and it seems to work nicely that way. Still, if there's a specific LL that pisses you off because they've cheated one way or another...it just seems easier to me to post their names on your rules page. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
There's Xanax in my thurible!
|
Quote:
![]() When I submit a free-site -- a rare occurance nowadays -- I only submit to regualar posters on GG & Jim. This boards given me a lot and I want to give back to those that have helped and supported me. Besides...regular posters here are either honest or obviously not and it's easy to avoid those few. ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|