2257 News

[RawAlex]

Something of slightly more concern, the TRO expires this week, and the DoJ's move would suggest that they may have less interest in extending it again (for the 5th or 6th time or whatever).

The sky is not falling YET. Motions like this strike me as being par for the course, nothing serious yet. It is interesting to see the points that the government treat as most important (why should privacy of sex workers be more important than making sure children are not abused?). You can see exactly where they are going to hammer.

Thankfully, the courts generally have shown a tendancy to ask both sides for "better solutions" that can solve both issues. It will take a good long while before we get there.

Meanwhile... programs keep dropping out of the industry.

Alex

[Useless]

Originally Posted by RawAlex

It is interesting to see the points that the government treat as most important (why should privacy of sex workers be more important than making sure children are not abused?). You can see exactly where they are going to hammer.

Their wording really gives them away.

Further, plaintiffs erroneously assert that a right to privacy in basic driver’s license information of individuals who have sex for money on camera trumps basic protections designed to protect children from sexual exploitation.

My translation: It's okay to kill heathens who don't think and believe the way we do.