Greenguy's Board


Go Back   Greenguy's Board > General Business Knowledge
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 2005-12-27, 11:43 PM   #8
RawAlex
Took the hint.
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 5,597
Send a message via AIM to RawAlex
If I read right, they are only moving to have the FSC request for a full injunction quashed. From where I sit, it is very unlikely that the courts would allow such a questionable "bending" of the law be enforced while a significant challenge that could go all the way to the supreme court is pending.

There is also the previous "reno vs " case where the DoJ got it's hands slapped for having the gall to try to re-write legislation rather than just running with the rules as passed by the house and senate and signed by the President of the day. It is likely this is why Hatch and his cronies are so actively trying to pass new legislation to clean up the 2257 rules, considering it very likely that the DoJ's "rule clairifcations" will get tossed with last week's coffee.

Alex
RawAlex is offline   Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:39 PM.


Mark Read
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© Greenguy Marketing Inc