 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-01-19, 01:15 PM
|
#1 |
|
Rock stars ... is there anything they don't know?
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Santa Clara, CA
Posts: 18
  |
The models used in those particular GEO ads are StreamRay Cam girls who must submit two forms of ID in order to work with StreamRay.
__________________
Please Re-Read The Rules For Sig Files |
|
|
|
2006-01-19, 01:29 PM
|
#2 | |
|
Jim? I heard he's a dirty pornographer.
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 2,706
|
Quote:
Are you saying that AFF does NOT have a copy of her IDs on file and that you're relying on a third party to verify the age of models in your promotional material? |
|
|
|
|
|
2006-01-19, 01:41 PM
|
#3 | |
|
Rock stars ... is there anything they don't know?
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Santa Clara, CA
Posts: 18
|
Quote:
The images are hosted by StreamRay. You should also know that last year StreamRay and FriendFinder Inc merged and are now owned by the same parent company Various Inc. So essentially AFF does have a copy of all the IDs. I have sent an e-mail to 2257@streamray.com just to verify the age of this model.
__________________
Please Re-Read The Rules For Sig Files |
|
|
|
|
|
2006-01-19, 03:47 PM
|
#4 | |
|
Jim? I heard he's a dirty pornographer.
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 2,706
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-01-19, 05:37 PM
|
#5 |
|
You can now put whatever you want in this space :)
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: New Haven, CT
Posts: 985
|
She does look underage to me, and I wouldn't use that banner. Still, there's nothing in the text "innocentleila" that implies she's underage. If AFF has her valid ID then that's good enough for me. It might still be a good idea to remove her from the ad and create a teen niche filter for webmasters that want to filter out portraits of youngish looking models.
__________________
Success is going from failure to failure without a loss of enthusiasm. |
|
|
|
|
2006-01-19, 05:52 PM
|
#6 | |
|
Lonewolf Internet Sales
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Houston
Posts: 4,826
|
Quote:
Perhaps I go a little beyond the line on this topic. I don't even allow the words "teen" or "young" to be used on galleries submitted to my TGP's. I'd rather there not be any question about the content on my sites in regards to age of the models. |
|
|
|
|
|
2006-01-19, 09:08 PM
|
#7 | |
|
Arghhhh...submit yer sites ya ruddy swabs!
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Sunny Florida!
Posts: 5,108
|
Quote:
 I tend to scrutinize teen sites very carefully myself. None of the teddy bears and braces bullshit...and I wouldn't touch that banner with a ten foot pole. |
|
|
|
|
|
2006-01-23, 03:18 PM
|
#8 | |
|
You can now put whatever you want in this space :)
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 525
|
Hypocrisy ?
Quote:
The above reflects a general trend that one can come across quite often and really deserves some thought. Everyone agrees that no one wants CP in any context. BUT its disingenuous to cry about political interference on the one hand and then say on the other ooooo, she "looks" too young. Cripes its not her fault and if she is legal and has appropriate documentation and is sponsored by a reputable site how is it that a WM can feel comfortable with "censoring" her from making an income? If one doesn't have the guts to stand up then one shouldn't be in the business. If you are helping to enforce the atmoshpere of fear by self regulating materials that might, maybe, could piss someone off or won't portray porn that is "seeming" to skate close to some edge (in your opinoin) regardless of it being legal then you need to question whether there is another biz that's better suited to your fearful, squimish, gutless, lazy, nature. Legal is legal. There are now a ton of solo girl sites that are legal and use the proverbial "teddy bear" props or coy "finger to the mouth" looks. If you self censor these sites you are falling right into the hands of what you are complaining about in some other post about government over reaching. Of course you can run your biz the way you want. But think about hypocrisy and what it means? Also, how 'bout this "due diligence", know who you are working with, verify the reputable natures of the paysites you sponsor, research, etc. Lazy bottom feeding is repugnant and if a WM is failing to support sites that they know have their shit together and are legal (I mean how much more solid can you get than AFF?) because "they don't want any trouble....  then IMHO they should just beat it out the door. When do people get it through their heads that this is a "trouble" business?  Thank you for letting me get that off my chest... |
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
