 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: What internet content label do you think should be the standard and promoted as such? | |||
| ICRA label (or another existing system) |
   
|
8 | 10.67% |
| A simple <content="adult"> meta tag |
  
|
45 | 60.00% |
| A more complex tag with varying content levels but still one that is just inserted in the html (much like current TV or MPA ratings) |
  
|
11 | 14.67% |
| A meta label combined with V-chip type system |
  
|
5 | 6.67% |
| No label |
  
|
6 | 8.00% |
| Voters: 75. You may not vote on this poll | |||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
2006-02-14, 11:42 PM
|
#1 |
|
Took the hint.
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 5,597
 |
Meatpounder - repeat that process for 1000 domains and tens if not hundreds of thousands of pages... and tell me why this is good for me again?
Alex |
|
|
|
2006-02-15, 12:26 AM
|
#2 | |
|
Women might be able to fake orgasms But men can fake whole relationships
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Fort Lauderdale, Fl
Posts: 2,408
|
Quote:
About 83 hrs total for that massive amount of sites if they are actually being used for porn. Very few if any have that many domains, and those that do would have a staff handling the mindboggling amount of labor entailed actually using those sites. Well look at it this way...if just for example they get their way and create .xxx 1000 sites to purchase for god knows how much...1000 sites to move over, millions of links to change. Countless weeks of labor I would say, not 83 hrs. Much better to be pro-active and do a simple thing in my opinion. Of course you bring up those with 1000 sites, how many realistically if any have 1000 active porn sites that would be immediately impacted? All this hemming and hawing rather then us just uniting and doing SOMETHING. No wonder this is such an issue with the Feds. We cannot even agree that we as adult webmasters should even do anything to attempt to stop children from surfing porn. |
|
|
|
|
|
2006-02-15, 01:29 AM
|
#3 | |
|
Selling porn allows me to stay in a constant state of Bliss - ain't that a trip!
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 3,914
|
Quote:
Already, thru this discussuion in several threads, we've established that most of us are already using some type of relevant browser self-rating systems already. Some use the meta "ratings" tags. Some use the ICRA/PICS tags. Some use both. Any one of these choices seems perfectly suitable to me, altho I think that using the ICRA/PICS tags alone is the weakest, because it is not obvious to parents and politicians, and therefore is politically irrelevant. So, really, that part of the discussion is complete, altho there may be some technical niceties to decide later, such as wether its possible to create a visible and obvious PICS tag that would be politically relevant. So, self-rating methods are decided, what's the next step in the process? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hybrid Mode
