Greenguy Stats Run - What Would You Like To See, Skippy?

nekrom · 2006-02-21, 12:29 AM

Imo Option 1 mate.
It would show more program diversification than option 2.

Also showing first page unique ratios, and/or stating if x program only displays 2nd page (and if so a rough 1st page guestimation click count) as well as the $ amount per unique click.

Other then that I can't think of any other relevant data to display.

2cents
-N

[BV] · 2006-02-21, 12:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nekrom

Imo Option 1 mate.
It would show more program diversification than option 2. -N

I don't see how #1 would be more diverse, seeings how in option #1 there would be 0=none revshare sites.

That eliminates a lot of good sites, mine included

MrYum · 2006-02-21, 12:43 AM

I think option 2 gives a bigger overall picture

How tough would it be to add rev/click to that run?

I try to ignore ratios these days...$/click seems to be more relevant.

[BV] · 2006-02-21, 01:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MrYum

I think option 2 gives a bigger overall picture

How tough would it be to add rev/click to that run?

I try to ignore ratios these days...$/click seems to be more relevant.

A little tougher for the revshare model but I've seen it done, just divide your monthly revenue from sponsor by monthly uniques clicks = rev/click. With a good revshare program this rev/click number should climb each month without increasing traffic due to your rebills accumulating.

A larger problem I think might be programs that don't count first page uniques. These will not show correct in comparison to programs that do show 1st page, so you'd need to count your own clicks or something there.

nekrom · 2006-02-21, 05:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by [BV]

I don't see how... (sic)

Ya I left out the "from a pps program perspective". Option 2 would show less programs then option 1, but on the other hand 1 would show no revshare programs.

Idealy option 3 would be best but would be a crunt to compile.

-N

Seba · 2006-02-21, 08:44 AM

First option is cool for me

sue-fl · 2006-02-21, 12:37 AM

I like the first option Greenguy! I more or less just use a few niches, so like checking your stats out that way.

But since you do it by hand and it seems like a lot of work any way is fine.

2006-02-21, 12:43 AM	#3
MrYum Arghhhh...submit yer sites ya ruddy swabs! Join Date: May 2004 Location: Sunny Florida! Posts: 5,108	I think option 2 gives a bigger overall picture How tough would it be to add rev/click to that run? I try to ignore ratios these days...$/click seems to be more relevant. __________________ Porno Flixxx Submissions SOTI Site Submissions Free Porn Resource Submissions

2006-02-21, 12:29 AM	#1
nekrom Are you sure this is the Sci-Fi Convention? It's full of nerds! Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: Australia Posts: 263	Imo Option 1 mate. It would show more program diversification than option 2. Also showing first page unique ratios, and/or stating if x program only displays 2nd page (and if so a rough 1st page guestimation click count) as well as the $ amount per unique click. Other then that I can't think of any other relevant data to display. 2cents -N __________________ The afp ownz all your base.

2006-02-21, 08:44 AM	#6
Seba Rock stars ... is there anything they don't know? Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: Czech Republic Posts: 14	First option is cool for me

2006-02-21, 12:37 AM	#7
sue-fl You can now put whatever you want in this space :) Join Date: May 2005 Location: Florida Posts: 2,837	I like the first option Greenguy! I more or less just use a few niches, so like checking your stats out that way. But since you do it by hand and it seems like a lot of work any way is fine.