Affiliates: free content versus own content

[Toby]

It depends on the sponsor site. I promote mostly single girl amateur sites. Purchased content isn't a viable option, since I'm promoting a specific girl rather than a niche.

I don't know that better conversions is the issue re: using purchased content. It's more a matter of avoiding over used sponsor content in order to get your galleries approved. Approved galleries convert WAY better than declined ones.

[frankthetank]

Originally Posted by Toby

It depends on the sponsor site. I promote mostly single girl amateur sites. Purchased content isn't a viable option, since I'm promoting a specific girl rather than a niche.

I don't know that better conversions is the issue re: using purchased content. It's more a matter of avoiding over used sponsor content in order to get your galleries approved. Approved galleries convert WAY better than declined ones.

But on the other hand declined galleries burn much less bandwidth...

To get back to the question: I use sponsor content for those sites where using it is necessary, because they are specific sites and bought content won´t work.

A asked this questionon another board and I think it fits in here as well.

How much content does a 100% exclusive site need to give affiliates new content. On a regular basis.

Getting into the paysite game has been very interesting for me. It has given me a lot of fresh insight.

For instance. If a site is 100% exclusive with say 100 affiliates working with free content and say 100 scenes in the site.

How long before that content has been seen by ever free site on the Internet?

Because I've seen sites with under 40 scenes and wondering how they manage the free content side.

I'm only talking about the free content and FHGs.

I do know there are a few solo girl sites that feature models we shot. the sites give out the content they own, but not ours. We sell our sets to some of the affiliates of those sites.