Kodak Patents Age Verification Camera

Jim · 2006-05-29, 09:39 AM

I wonder if the intention of this stupid thing is that if you used it to take the pictures, your content is entirely legal. But that would also require some sort of embedded code in each picture it takes. And if there is some sort of embedded code, it seems, it wouldn't take long for someone to find it and be able to put it on any picture taken by any camera.

It seems to me that if this thing actually does what it claims, child pornographers would be more rampant than ever.

RedCherry · 2006-05-29, 12:23 PM

LOL it would probably think I was about 250 given I have an eye condition called aides pupil that my pupils don't constrict as fast as normal in reaction to light.

God help you if you have a minor with aides pupil and trying to use that fancy dan camera, might say she is older when she really isn't. I just think that is so much

to think you could judge age accurately with a camera.

docholly · 2006-05-29, 01:12 PM

i find it interesting that a mainstream company like Kodak would actually acknowledge that an "age verification" process would be necessary thus a back door endorsement of evil drinking, smoking and *gasp*.. porn.

Hmm maybe the next big elective surgery procedure will be pupil reduction to reduce the aging process. "Hey honey how old are you?" "I'm 30 it says so in my age verified pupil picture even though my driver's lic. says i'm 63".

2006-05-29, 12:23 PM	#2
RedCherry Of all the things I've lost, I miss my mind the most. Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: Middle of the Desert, Pahrump, NV Posts: 3,187	LOL it would probably think I was about 250 given I have an eye condition called aides pupil that my pupils don't constrict as fast as normal in reaction to light. God help you if you have a minor with aides pupil and trying to use that fancy dan camera, might say she is older when she really isn't. I just think that is so much to think you could judge age accurately with a camera. __________________ Our 3D Comics and Props on Renderotica

2006-05-29, 01:12 PM	#3
docholly Nothing funnier than the ridiculous faces you people make mid-coitus Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: Sin-City USA Posts: 4,973	i find it interesting that a mainstream company like Kodak would actually acknowledge that an "age verification" process would be necessary thus a back door endorsement of evil drinking, smoking and gasp.. porn. Hmm maybe the next big elective surgery procedure will be pupil reduction to reduce the aging process. "Hey honey how old are you?" "I'm 30 it says so in my age verified pupil picture even though my driver's lic. says i'm 63". __________________ Support Indie Porn Sites OMGoddess You know you need some Bling!!

2006-05-29, 09:39 AM	#1
Jim Banned Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: Mohawk, New York Posts: 19,477	I wonder if the intention of this stupid thing is that if you used it to take the pictures, your content is entirely legal. But that would also require some sort of embedded code in each picture it takes. And if there is some sort of embedded code, it seems, it wouldn't take long for someone to find it and be able to put it on any picture taken by any camera. It seems to me that if this thing actually does what it claims, child pornographers would be more rampant than ever.